Originally posted by Fenwoodian Adam, I watched the video that you posted on K1 MC. In it you say MC "possibly eliminates motion artifacts in a scene". That's an exaggeration too. Why pretend that it works better than it really does?
Pullease... what part of "possibly" do you not understand? Maybe the problem is your inability to interpret market speak.
Let me help, "probably" in market speak means "it might work some of the time." Pentax has already said the hand help pixel shift doesn't work as well as tripod mounted, so I hope I don't see you six months down the line saying Pentax actually said hand help pixels shift doesn't perform to you expectation as well.
Anyway the two important features of the K-1 mkII are improved AF and the accelerator chip cleaning up high ISO noise. There are forum posts that say both of those things are worth buying the camera for. Not interested in those two things, then stay with your K-1. I hope that helps.