Originally posted by aikaarska Ha! Ha! I thought those were
your images since the were posted by
you in response to doubts about
your claims, particularly since
you seem to have all the answers about their intent. BTW...all of the group for which we have the DNG shared the same LV and all are about 2/3 stop underexposed.
The most recent questions are in regards to the second round of fur posted by MJKoski, those which demonstrated data loss at ISO 800 and for which we have no DNG*. The DNG for those were promised for whenever they get back to their computer.
Originally posted by MJKoski I mentioned that you shall have the DNG files. I am 250km away from my offline file storage at the moment.
Steve
* I did not spend much time on the Finnish site since I don't trust the translation. I just now saw the second two fur images at the bottom of the forum post page and the signature links indicating that the Maffer who posted the fur photos is our own MJKoski.