Originally posted by Rico That's a simple answer LensBeginner. The K-1 without the Accelerator Unit could not manage such an image.
Could you please elaborate a bit more, why the same result cannot be achieved without the Accelerator Unit on a plain K-1 even as a test? Am I missing something?
---------- Post added 06-22-18 at 11:27 AM ----------
Originally posted by Mikesul I am sorry, Tax, but your lecture is way off base. I have spent my life carefully analyzing decisions of myself and of others. I am here for fun . I owe you no explanation. Your analysis is baseless, silly and inappropriate on a photography forum. I won't respond again. Your fun is simply corrosive.
Mikesul, I am not lecturing anyone. I just try to collect as much technical information as possible regarding K-1 vs K-1 II. This is the only analysis I am trying to do in here to make the right decision on my K-1 upgrade. It appears, that your selection and purchase of K-1 II was not based on is technical superiority over K-1, and you may have some emotional rather than rational attachments to both cameras. Which is perfectly fine with me. I am here for fun as well, but if you don't understand my tax and bankruptcy related professional jokes, not related to you in any way, please just ignore them. Please have all the fun you can handle.