K-1II review... Opportunity to get banned on DPR

Andrea K · 05-11-2018, 02:01 AM - **2 Likes**

Originally posted by madbrain

Maybe I did, or maybe not, but my reply was about your crop/screenshots of the DPR review tool, not the crops of your own processing of the RAW files.
What I was saying is that those JPEGs of the DPR tool look completely different than when I go directly to the corresponding DPR review tool URL for the same cameras and ISO.
They looked different both in terms of colors and amount of detail. Unfortunately, Pentaxforums very highly compresses any files uploaded. I have some Pixelshift files from my K-1 II which are nearly 200MB. I can generate a 3MB JPG from them. And then PF compresses them to 180KB ... That makes PF uploads pretty useless for purposes of image comparison, unfortunately

NICE FIND!!! They changed the k-1 Mk II images!!! Check also the file sizes!!!

NOW

BEFORE:

**madbrain** · 05-11-2018, 02:09 AM

Originally posted by Andrea K

NICE FIND!!! They changed the k-1 Mk II images!!! Check also the file sizes!!!

NOW

BEFORE:

Wow . Seems like DPR has an egg on its face. Maybe it was them who cooked the RAW files, and not Pentax ? But actually, only the JPEG file size changed, not the RAW file size. Yet "RAW" was selected. So I wonder why the image looks different if file size did not change.
Do you still have the copy of the previous RAW file, and can you compare it with the current one ?

Andrea K · 05-11-2018, 02:22 AM

DNG are the same then there was a problem with JPEG conversion of the RAW.

Also here:
Weird stuff - changing files over time - PentaxForums.com

**madbrain** · 05-11-2018, 02:41 AM

Originally posted by Andrea K

DNG are the same then there was a problem with JPEG conversion of the RAW.

Also here:
Weird stuff - changing files over time - PentaxForums.com

So why did your 2 screenshots look so different, since you had selected RAW in both ?

Andrea K · 05-11-2018, 02:47 AM

Originally posted by madbrain

So why did your 2 screenshots look so different, since you had selected RAW in both ?

Because what you see in the DPR comparison tool, that is a web tool, isn't the real RAW but a JPEG developed directly from the RAW.

**madbrain** · 05-11-2018, 02:52 AM

Originally posted by Andrea K

Because what you see in the DPR comparison tool, that is a web tool, isn't the real RAW but a JPEG developed directly from the RAW.

Sure, but if the RAWs haven't changed, the developed JPEGs that the tool shows when you click "RAW" shouldn't change either.
Unless they have changed not just the OOC JPEG files, but the output of the processing of unchanged RAW files.

swanlefitte · 05-11-2018, 03:22 AM

the raws have changed I just downloaded the new one and the old one had camera raw process version 6.7, the new one version 10.

Andrea K · 05-11-2018, 03:49 AM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by madbrain

Sure, but if the RAWs haven't changed, the developed JPEGs that the tool shows when you click "RAW" shouldn't change either.
Unless they have changed not just the OOC JPEG files, but the output of the processing of unchanged RAW files.

When you click RAW you are not watching the JPEG inside the RAW but a JPEG that they have processed.

**monochrome** · 05-11-2018, 04:02 AM - **2 Likes**

Changing [~~RAWs~~ RAW-linked, and separately displayed]* jpegs without attribution is beyond dishonest. It is active sabotage. At this point they should take down the entire article, confess, and start over.

*edited for accuracy. It is now beyond confusing what they’re doing.

**madbrain** · 05-11-2018, 04:24 AM

Originally posted by Andrea K

When you click RAW you are not watching the JPEG inside the RAW but a JPEG that they have processed.

Yes, I get that. So, to recap :
1) DPR changed the files from OOC JPEGs . Your screenshots clearly show this - file sizes of JPEGs have changed.
2) DPR left the RAW files alone for download Your screenshots show RAW file size is unchanged.
3) DPR have changed the JPEGs that are shown when you click "RAW" in their comparison tool . Ie. they have reprocessed the RAW files to JPEG

Andrea K · 05-11-2018, 04:24 AM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by monochrome

Changing RAWs and jpegs without attribution is beyond dishonest. It is active sabotage. At this point they should take down the entire article, confess, and start over.

No RAW change, they changed the processed JPEG from RAW. Adding the different and defective lens I'm with you about "At this point they should take down the entire article, confess, and start over.".

D1N0 · 05-11-2018, 04:25 AM - **2 Likes**

They nullify Pentax's standard raw adjustments in lightroom and apply their own WB and exposure compensation. First pic is wat DPReview shows us, second is what is loaded into lightroom by default with noise and sharpness adjustments:

MJKoski · 05-11-2018, 04:34 AM - **1 Like**

That is quite weird, if DNG has process version tag it means it was processed and saved again as DNG. OOC DNG RAW EXIF from K-1 does not have any process version -tags. I can take a TIFF anytime and add postprocessing to the file and save it again as DNG if I want. What a mess.

Andrea K · 05-11-2018, 04:48 AM

I have to add that they shot also with D-Range highlights correction at ON. This affected also the RAW.

Tan68 · 05-11-2018, 05:19 AM

Originally posted by Andrea K

Excuse me, the crops are from this procedure: K-1II review... Opportunity to get banned on DPR - Page 2 - PentaxForums.com

Here 12800 ISO:

That in DPR comparison tool is:

Where the k-1 MkII absolutely shines is in the DPR Low Light test.... I can't explain why so much difference between the two scenes:

at:
Image comparison: Digital Photography Review

This with RAW comparison... If you select JPEG the result is reversed again...

The copper coin does have more detail but much of the bill has less detail in the new K-1 sample. Are these samples from the original DPR ..sample image or are they samples from the K-1 II image recently posted by DPR.

05-11-2018, 04:02 AM - 2 Likes	#204
monochrome Lens Hoarder Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: St. Louis, MO Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 24,943	Changing [~~RAWs~~ RAW-linked, and separately displayed]* jpegs without attribution is beyond dishonest. It is active sabotage. At this point they should take down the entire article, confess, and start over. edited for accuracy. It is now beyond confusing what they’re doing. Last edited by monochrome; 05-11-2018 at 06:02 AM.*

05-11-2018, 04:24 AM	#205
madbrain Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 1,169	Originally posted by Andrea K When you click RAW you are not watching the JPEG inside the RAW but a JPEG that they have processed. Yes, I get that. So, to recap : 1) DPR changed the files from OOC JPEGs . Your screenshots clearly show this - file sizes of JPEGs have changed. 2) DPR left the RAW files alone for download Your screenshots show RAW file size is unchanged. 3) DPR have changed the JPEGs that are shown when you click "RAW" in their comparison tool . Ie. they have reprocessed the RAW files to JPEG Last edited by madbrain; 05-11-2018 at 04:29 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
an opportunity: Super Blue Blood Moon	aslyfox	General Photography	37	01-31-2018 10:23 PM
where and how to find " wild life " photography opportunity	aslyfox	General Photography	37	08-21-2017 01:20 PM
Another "Supermoon" Opportunity	RobA_Oz	General Photography	8	12-28-2016 11:11 PM
Banned on DPR, anyone else?	KL Matt	General Talk	44	11-22-2013 03:51 PM
Keep K-x buy premium lens, get K-r and get good lens, get the K-7 w/ lens or K-5?	crossover37	Pentax DSLR Discussion	19	02-06-2011 10:38 PM

05-11-2018, 02:01 AM - 2 Likes	#196
Andrea K Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, Italy Posts: 462	Originally posted by madbrain Maybe I did, or maybe not, but my reply was about your crop/screenshots of the DPR review tool, not the crops of your own processing of the RAW files. What I was saying is that those JPEGs of the DPR tool look completely different than when I go directly to the corresponding DPR review tool URL for the same cameras and ISO. They looked different both in terms of colors and amount of detail. Unfortunately, Pentaxforums very highly compresses any files uploaded. I have some Pixelshift files from my K-1 II which are nearly 200MB. I can generate a 3MB JPG from them. And then PF compresses them to 180KB ... That makes PF uploads pretty useless for purposes of image comparison, unfortunately NICE FIND!!! They changed the k-1 Mk II images!!! Check also the file sizes!!! NOW BEFORE:

05-11-2018, 02:09 AM	#197
madbrain Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 1,169	Originally posted by Andrea K NICE FIND!!! They changed the k-1 Mk II images!!! Check also the file sizes!!! NOW BEFORE: Wow . Seems like DPR has an egg on its face. Maybe it was them who cooked the RAW files, and not Pentax ? But actually, only the JPEG file size changed, not the RAW file size. Yet "RAW" was selected. So I wonder why the image looks different if file size did not change. Do you still have the copy of the previous RAW file, and can you compare it with the current one ?

05-11-2018, 02:22 AM	#198
Andrea K Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, Italy Posts: 462	DNG are the same then there was a problem with JPEG conversion of the RAW. Also here: Weird stuff - changing files over time - PentaxForums.com

05-11-2018, 02:41 AM	#199
madbrain Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 1,169	Originally posted by Andrea K DNG are the same then there was a problem with JPEG conversion of the RAW. Also here: Weird stuff - changing files over time - PentaxForums.com So why did your 2 screenshots look so different, since you had selected RAW in both ?

05-11-2018, 02:47 AM	#200
Andrea K Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, Italy Posts: 462	Originally posted by madbrain So why did your 2 screenshots look so different, since you had selected RAW in both ? Because what you see in the DPR comparison tool, that is a web tool, isn't the real RAW but a JPEG developed directly from the RAW.

05-11-2018, 02:52 AM	#201
madbrain Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 1,169	Originally posted by Andrea K Because what you see in the DPR comparison tool, that is a web tool, isn't the real RAW but a JPEG developed directly from the RAW. Sure, but if the RAWs haven't changed, the developed JPEGs that the tool shows when you click "RAW" shouldn't change either. Unless they have changed not just the OOC JPEG files, but the output of the processing of unchanged RAW files.

05-11-2018, 03:22 AM	#202
swanlefitte Pentaxian Join Date: May 2015 Location: New Orleans Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,413	the raws have changed I just downloaded the new one and the old one had camera raw process version 6.7, the new one version 10.

05-11-2018, 03:49 AM - 1 Like	#203
Andrea K Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, Italy Posts: 462	Originally posted by madbrain Sure, but if the RAWs haven't changed, the developed JPEGs that the tool shows when you click "RAW" shouldn't change either. Unless they have changed not just the OOC JPEG files, but the output of the processing of unchanged RAW files. When you click RAW you are not watching the JPEG inside the RAW but a JPEG that they have processed.

05-11-2018, 04:24 AM - 1 Like	#206
Andrea K Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, Italy Posts: 462	Originally posted by monochrome Changing RAWs and jpegs without attribution is beyond dishonest. It is active sabotage. At this point they should take down the entire article, confess, and start over. No RAW change, they changed the processed JPEG from RAW. Adding the different and defective lens I'm with you about "At this point they should take down the entire article, confess, and start over.".

05-11-2018, 04:25 AM - 2 Likes	#207
D1N0 Pentaxian Join Date: May 2012 Location: --- Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,762	They nullify Pentax's standard raw adjustments in lightroom and apply their own WB and exposure compensation. First pic is wat DPReview shows us, second is what is loaded into lightroom by default with noise and sharpness adjustments:

05-11-2018, 04:34 AM - 1 Like	#208
MJKoski Pentaxian Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 1,397	That is quite weird, if DNG has process version tag it means it was processed and saved again as DNG. OOC DNG RAW EXIF from K-1 does not have any process version -tags. I can take a TIFF anytime and add postprocessing to the file and save it again as DNG if I want. What a mess.

05-11-2018, 04:48 AM	#209
Andrea K Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Rome, Italy Posts: 462	I have to add that they shot also with D-Range highlights correction at ON. This affected also the RAW.

05-11-2018, 05:19 AM	#210
Tan68 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Photos: Albums Posts: 501	Originally posted by Andrea K Excuse me, the crops are from this procedure: K-1II review... Opportunity to get banned on DPR - Page 2 - PentaxForums.com Here 12800 ISO: That in DPR comparison tool is: Where the k-1 MkII absolutely shines is in the DPR Low Light test.... I can't explain why so much difference between the two scenes: at: Image comparison: Digital Photography Review This with RAW comparison... If you select JPEG the result is reversed again... The copper coin does have more detail but much of the bill has less detail in the new K-1 sample. Are these samples from the original DPR ..sample image or are they samples from the K-1 II image recently posted by DPR.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search