Originally posted by SSGGeezer No, someone is just trying to make a statement about a KP (since it has the accelerator chip,) into a false equivalence about a previous post. That post just stated that the accelerator equipped KP put out amazing images, which it does.
No, the previous post did not just state that the KP puts out amazing images.
In that post caliscouser is not sure what the heck is going on [with the K-1] and wonders if the K-1 sensor is not amenable to the co-processor...
In response, I suggest people are perfectly happy with the KP output because there is nothing to directly compare with the KP. Without doubt, this is possible :^)
People are comparing minutiae and finding some aspects of K-1 better and some aspects of K-1 II better.. it is possible these people teetering between K-1 better or K-1 II better would have been, without reservation, happy with accelerator had it been included with the K-1 and had there then been no opportunity to compare so exhaustively to a previous model... just as with the KP
Hope this clears up any confusion !
But, could you help me with a comment I find confusing?
What does this mean : "...into a false equivalence about a previous post."