Originally posted by leekil I'm not complaining about the high-ISO performance of the K-1 ii (I mean, I'm still keeping an eye on how the testing goes), but yeah, I take a lot of ISO 6400 images and print them.
---------- Post added 05-25-18 at 10:43 PM ----------
I have more at 3200 on the K-5, which is probably comparable (if not slightly inferior) than the K-1 at 6400.
And where can i see these photos? I've seen exactly one 6400 ISO image I thought was worth keeping and it was taken with a 645z. IN any case, I just find high ISO images to be gamble. They may turn out, they may not. I've personally had even 800 ISO images that were too noisy to use on a K-3. But that doesn't mean others wouldn't have been happy with them.
I'm quite impressed with your use of high ISO, I'd just like to know we are working from the same set of standards.
Personally I expect any image I keep on my drive to be sellable to someone with no personal attachment to the subject matter.
Last edited by normhead; 05-26-2018 at 07:55 AM.