Interesting. But ultimately, punchier images from the K-1 mkII, better under-exposed images from the k-1, loss of detail at extremely high ISO, better to use the K-1.
My take is 100-800 at 0.0 EV where I like to shoot the K1-mkii will produce punchier images. What does that mean? Probably that I would alter my K-1 preset from a contrast value of 2 to1, and my contrast setting from 1 to .5, and get essentially the same image after step one of the PP process.
So far, not a lot of value to the K-1 mkII, unless it's to be found in the new AF algorithm.
It certainly doesn't look like the Accelerator chip did what it was supposed to do in very high ISO images.
Quote: About the blurry image - the focus point is different on those pictures.
Same lens (Rokinon 14 2.8, which I own. The DoF is extremely wide. That's extremely unlikely. About half the play in the focus ring is in focal at any given setting. He would have had to move the hyperfocla setting to somewhere pass infinity to mess up that shot.