Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-13-2018, 07:11 AM   #1
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Mikesul's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,591
K-1 is noticeably smaller than D850 in most measures but ..

K-1 is noticeably smaller than D850 in most measures but it is 5 gms heavier. https://camerasize.com/compare/#773,718 What adds the extra weight? It is clearly smaller in most visual measures.

06-13-2018, 07:23 AM - 10 Likes   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,694
According to Google: an American Nickel weighs 5 Grams. I fail to see a problem here, perhaps the built in GPS adds the extra weight, perhaps the magnesium alloy the body is made from is denser than the D850* . FYI The Pentax K-1 is smaller than the APS-C Canon 7D MKII.... Hilarious.

Let's start a completely bogus rumor:



Pentax hides one of these in every K-1 in some Auric Goldfinger style plot to destabilize gold prices.


* which wouldn't surprise me, really.

Last edited by Digitalis; 06-13-2018 at 07:29 AM.
06-13-2018, 07:25 AM   #3
Pentaxian
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,175
QuoteOriginally posted by Mikesul Quote
K-1 is noticeably smaller than D850 in most measures but it is 5 gms heavier. Compare camera dimensions side by side What adds the extra weight? It is clearly smaller in most visual measures.
For one thing, the sensor would weigh more because of IBIS.

A certain amount of a DSLR is air because of the light path from mirror to prism box, so physical size doesn't mean much.
06-13-2018, 07:32 AM - 1 Like   #4
Pentaxian
D1N0's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: ---
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,802
Because the K-1 is more solid.

06-13-2018, 07:37 AM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ffking's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Old South Wales
Posts: 6,038
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
For one thing, the sensor would weigh more because of IBIS.
Yes - I've always suspected IBIS - which is a swings and roundabouts situation as there is no stabilisation mechanism in the lens - having said which, the modern Pentax lenses aren't especially light
06-13-2018, 07:39 AM - 1 Like   #6
Pentaxian
Fogel70's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,062
I believe the 5g difference is because Pentax use thicker gold plating on the PCBs.
06-13-2018, 07:39 AM - 1 Like   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ffking's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Old South Wales
Posts: 6,038
QuoteOriginally posted by Digitalis Quote
Pentax hides one of these in every K-1 in some Auric Goldfinger style plot to destabilize gold prices.
we'll wait for the spike in sales

06-13-2018, 07:40 AM   #8
Veteran Member
Ontarian50's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 530
I haven't had a K-1 apart (yet), but there's no doubt the precision machined metal sandwich that floats the IBIS sensor adds to the heft of Pentaxes.

As commented earlier, there is a good deal of airspace inside most DSLRs. Packing it into a smaller body just makes it denser, not necessarily lighter.
06-13-2018, 07:56 AM   #9
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 4,833
Shake reduction has to weigh something. I don't think the D850 has GPS, saving a few more grams.

I upgraded from the K-5 to the K-1. The extra body size and weight is noticeable but not offensive. For general walkaround my kit is around the same size and weight because the 28-105 I pair with my K-1 is smaller and lighter than the 16-50 I used with my K-5.
06-13-2018, 08:08 AM - 2 Likes   #10
Senior Member
rodaballo's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 158
How could the Pentax K-1 be smaller than the Nikon if DPR says that the Pentax is large and obtrusive?
06-13-2018, 08:09 AM   #11
Junior Member




Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 45
I would guess it is a combination of things, such as the IBIS and the GPS which are built in. The K1's articulated screen mechanism is also potentially weightier as it involves more moving parts.
In hand, the K1 is one of the densest feeling DSLRs I've ever used, but in practice the various full frame models I have experience with (5dmkii, D600, D810, K1) feel comparable.
06-13-2018, 08:47 AM - 1 Like   #12
Digitiser of Film
Loyal Site Supporter
BigMackCam's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North East of England
Posts: 20,642
QuoteOriginally posted by Digitalis Quote
Pentax hides one of these in every K-1
They wouldn't be the first to use metal weights in their cameras... Witness the impressive "Olympia" below, with its "focus free" 50mm f/6.3 "optical lens" (no non-optical lenses in this little beauty). Apparently, it has a lump of lead in the base to make it feel even more substantial
Attached Images
 
06-13-2018, 09:02 AM   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 15,132
Lol, I know those cameras, I might even find one for sale if I could be bored enough to look.
06-13-2018, 09:06 AM   #14
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Mikesul's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,591
Original Poster
So maybe the correct question should be: is the D850 et al. made large just to appeal to those strange people who always seem to want bigger cameras from Pentax and Sony?
06-13-2018, 09:14 AM   #15
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 11,019
Did you really expect people to know why one camera has an insignificant 5 grams of mass more than another?
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
american, australia, caramel, drive, dslr, du, full frame, full-frame, grapes, k-1, k1, leaf, matter, peepers, pentax k-1, popcorn, post, restaurant, shields, trip, valley, vine, visit, wine
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DxOMark measures K-3II rawr Pentax News and Rumors 185 12-23-2015 05:48 PM
K-3 II noticeably slower than K-5 II shooting manual bursts flonix Pentax K-3 & K-3 II 24 09-17-2015 10:38 PM
How much blur? Handy website "measures" bokeh EarlVonTapia Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 05-04-2015 09:54 AM
Have you found that K-7 Firmware 1.1 Improved AF Noticeably? Christopher M.W.T Pentax DSLR Discussion 18 08-08-2010 07:25 AM
Noticeably Reduced Tension In the Forums Ron Boggs General Talk 33 04-22-2009 06:50 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:15 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top