Originally posted by MJKoski Classic CC is the right one. Restart the cloud application if it does not see the upgrade. If that does not help, restarting whole system usually fixes the problem with Windows PC.
Thanks. Multiple restarts got it updated, and I got the Mk2 files loaded.
I've been most interested in whether or not the Mk2 would let me shoot single shots at higher ISO rather than having to bother with tracking or stacking. So I fairly quickly compared the differences at 1600, 3200, 6400 and 12800.
General thoughts:
1. I see no evidence of any star-eater behavior in a quick look.
2. The Mk2 files are darker/underexposed at the same settings. This can be seen both visually and in the histogram. It's not too obvious at 12800, but at 3200 and 1600, it's pretty apparent. This is in looking at the straight raw files without any adjustment in LR.
3. Without adjusting, at 1600, 3200, and 6400, the K-1 files look better to me. At 12800, it's a wash. Not sure how much of this difference is due to my perception of the exposure difference versus actual detail differences.
Based solely on these photos and that quick comparison, not worth the upgrade to me.
Thanks Tom for taking the time do this for us!