For my use, where images are usually reduced in size for viewing, I'm guessing you aren't going to see a lot of difference. Only when you use every pixel are the differences likely to be noticeable. And when you look at the images, since the only way you are looking at that detail is in a print, the only information relevant is the size at which the differences become noticeable in a print file. On my screen with 109 PPI, it would have to be a 70 inch print to give you chance to see the difference. (My largest to date is 42 inches.) And even then, if and only if the printer is capable of differentiating that level of detail and personally I have no idea, but I suspect, based on comparison prints taken with other systems and posted in comparison videos, that printers do not.
As far as I can tell, the only possible use for such advantages is pixel peeping on computer screens. And in pixel peeping you've actually cropped the image so much you've lost the most important element, the composition. So, I'm kind of seeing this as a the K-1ii being the best at what matters the least. But of course, I'm always open to other points of view.
Last edited by normhead; 01-17-2019 at 10:30 AM.