Originally posted by fs999 Yes. In body NR is not always the best choice. But if your RAW has been NRed and you try to apply your own NR, the result shows loss of details, which is not the case with not NRed RAWs.
Loss of detai versus what? Theoretically and perhaps logically versus an unprocessed RAW, but I don’t believe there is any such animal as an unprocessed RAW from any camera. A mathematically derived graph comparing one file
theoretically to another just doesn’t convince me of anything that actually matters in real life.
If in body NR is such a big deal on K-1, why wasn’t there such a firestorm about it on KP?
Last edited by monochrome; 07-25-2019 at 04:49 AM.