Originally posted by Sandy Hancock I buy my equipment to use it, and don't get too sentimental about the occasional graze. Bodies especially depreciate really quickly, so keeping them pristine for a potential resale seems to be a little precious.
As a shooter and collector of Leica Camera bodies as well, I concur with Sandy on this. The black paint on Leicas wears off if you use them long enough, and as it wears, creates a very interesting patina over the brass/magnesium of the Leica body. My K-3ii has been through some scrapes, but as it is a Pentax is a warrior. Cosmetic damage to me is no different than the scars, age spots and wear us Humans go through. However, unlike humans, a well-used camera demonstrates the life it was created for. Pentaxes, unlike other 'disposable' cameras are built well and are durable. The tumble you and your camera had, may have cracked and damaged a lesser brand. That's why when I decided on a camera system, I chose build and quality over other might I say, frivolous features. Neither Pentax nor Leica represent the total 'state of technological art', But I can say that after dropping, stepping on, rough travel handling, etc., these bodies take the proverbial "licking" and keep on "ticking". Even my KP has been roughed up and continues to perform like the mini-K-1 it specs out to be.
Remember, aesthetics doesn't mean as much as the lengths one goes to find that one special frozen moment in time. Acrylic paint will probably work well if you must re-touch. Anyway, keep us posted on what you decide to employ.