Originally posted by BigMackCam Modern manuals are pretty awful things - perhaps because there's just so much functionality in these computers with image sensors that we've learned to call "cameras"
I don't think it has anything to do with the complexity of the product but rather the desire to cost cut 'unnecessary' areas. Tech writing has always been a production
cost 'necessary evil' even in the best of times.
Originally posted by BigMackCam the user manual for an old Yaesu radio receiver I own. It's in letter-sized format, printed on thick, glossy paper, bound with an even thicker cover, and a pleasure to hold, look at and read. It not only explains how - and, importantly, WHY - each control on the radio is operated, but includes a full service procedure for testing, trouble-shooting and aligning it using basic tools almost anyone would own (or could borrow). Compared to modern manuals, it's a revelation.
Heck, the manual for the K10D was at least twice as thick as the manual for the K-3. That tendency towards cost cutting extends into the modern age.
Anyone remember the novella sized manuals that used to ship with PC video games? Almost no developer writes manuals like that anymore; the burden
of writing a 'manual' has been shifted onto the players, in the guise of fan hosted wikia pages and such. One might argue that fan sites like Pentax Forums,
and the internet in general, have let companies like Ricoh off the hook when it comes to providing an in depth manual.