Originally posted by Des Several people have mentioned it in this thread as one of the reasons to get the KP instead.
No-one outside Ricoh really knows how common it is because there are no published figures. There don't seem to be as many user reports of ABF here as on previous models, but enough to think it is still a problem. @Photogem is the expert on the solenoid. He might weigh in.
I've had ABF on my K-S2 and it is a PITA. I think it's another good reason to get a KP if you can (the KP and other high end models use a different mechanism which doesn't have the same problem).
He has weighed in on this several times. As I recall it's a relative non-issue on the current K-70's. For whatever reason, aperture block failure gets mentioned as some kind of serious concern to be had with the K-70 in every thread asking for purchase advice, and from folks who don't use a K-70. Some even promote it as a failure just waiting to happen. It is not. A K-70 purchased new today has a different and more reliable solenoid than the old K-30's and K-50's where it actually was something to be aware of. The likelihood of a similar failure on a new in-the-box K-70 is slim and that's according to the forums "expert on the solenoid", @Photogem. You're welcome for him to chime in and restate what he's had to say on the topic rather than accept my recollection.
Continuously bashing the K-70 for no reason other than "I read this somewhere so it must be right" is not helpful (Not referring to you Des). Yup, a handful of K-70 owners have feared they had aperture block failure at the first sign of something not looking right. When all was said and done several of them were determined to have some other issue instead.
Verified aperture-block failures on a K-70 are pretty rare, but of course not totally unheard of. Every camera from every brand has a chance of failing. Buttons have fallen off KP's, the focus mechanism has failed, and the shutter hasn't cooperated in cold weather for some owners, but those issues are pretty rare too and hardly worth worrying about. Those rare but possible failures aren't promoted, unlike aperture blocks on the K-70.
Yes the KP has some less-essential but useful features that a more advanced shooter might find desirable. Or not. I've had both and TBH did not find the K-70 lacking in comparison, and I had expected I would which is why I purchased a KP to begin with. Excitedly I might add. In actual use the additional controls and features weren't utilized as much as I had expected they would be. When I considered simple ergonomic reasons too it wasn't the camera for me. The K-70 was and still is. I have two of them as a matter of fact, with a third sold to a close friend of mine who has not had any issue with hers other than user error (she comes from a Canon background). My KP has moved on to another forum member who enjoys it more than I did. If you can find a new KP at a reasonable price I think it's a fine choice. It has some helpful mid-range controls a photographer might like to have as they advance even if the final image is essentially identical from both bodies. Worst case is you find the ergonomics of the KP aren't for you and attracting a second-hand buyer is easy.
On the other hand, buying a used camera might come with it's own unique issues unless the provenance is known, which is why the majority of gear buyers prefer new to used. If both the K-70 and KP were available new then my opinion would be tempered, but they aren't. A KP will almost assuredly be second or third hand with no warranty, which I'm not convinced ensures a better experience than purchasing a new in the box K-70, especially with the value it offers in comparison to options from other brands. Dollar for feature and image-wise the K-70 is an amazing bargain. There is no better value today in a new camera IMHO. If someone has reliability concerns with their new camera just add an extended warranty, which is not expensive to do either. Two of mine had a standard year while the third came with a three-year extended certificate in the box.
IMO "aperture block failure" worries in the K-70 have taken on a life of their own, the bark a whole lot worse than its actual bite. In addition to the obvious, those photographers or 'togs-to-be who are interested in Pentax and what value it offers get peppered with "on no, not Pentax. I've heard (fill in the blank). Buy a Canon/Nikon/Sony instead, because they're dependable" from users of other systems. It makes Pentax sound like a discount brand with no reliability... and we're feeding it! Not helpful nor accurate.
Soapbox put up.
EDIT for the OP: The K-70 is a great choice. Don't let maybe's and might's sway you. There is no better dollar-for-dollar value in a new pro-sumer grade SLR. If you were to happen upon a new-in-the-box KP it might also be a great choice for you, noting that the ergonomics of that body are quite unlike any other Pentax released in the past decade. Some immediately like it, others have adapted to it, and there's some who simply do not like it. Barring that new unused KP being stumbled upon, the K-70, new and under warranty, is the better choice IMO. Just go for it.
Last edited by gatorguy; 01-01-2022 at 02:29 PM.
Reason: Added comment for the OP