Originally posted by automorphism I think it's great not to have a printed manual. It's a huge environmental waste. .
An A5 paperback booklet with a $1500 camera that some people might buy the likes of only once or twice a lifetime? I don't think you know what a huge environmental waste is; you should spend a night with the cleaners on the London Underground. Every night they remove from the trains several tons of a discarded free newspaper called Metro, which is available from racks at stations (and is printed on better quality than normal newsprint). Same again for the main line commuter trains. That is as well as the other discarded newspapers, but I mention Metro as, being free, many people pick it up and then scarcely look at it.
I get more junk mail through my door in three months, some of it very high quality print on glossy card, than would make a camera manual. If you want to save the planet, there are far more effective ways to do it than not providing equipment manuals, but perhaps the green "warriors" prefer to just to piss off those they consider have too much money to spend. I suspect that if you do not need a manual yourself (and it seems to be something to boast about among millenennials) you are not using an SLR camera to its full advantage and might be better with a point-and-shoot.