Originally posted by reh321 My statements about the K-70 are fact.
So what to you is the difference between collected knowledge, experience and as a result... facts?
Can you really declare statements about the aperture control of the K-70, never having owned one, never ever disassembled one and studied the aperture control?
And what is the same difference about the solenoid?
Making one's own statements to facts when one actually has zero exerience with it seems rather critical to me.
But then:
Originally posted by reh321 We know that aperture control remains a weak spot of that line.
We know that when people have problems with that line the problem originates most of the time with the solenoid.
We know that the body's aperture control fails from passing of calendar time, that heavy usage is not an issue.
I don't think you should speak here for everybody, i.e. "we"....
... maybe better to write "I ... re321...think I know"
but then, do you really know never having owned a K70, never disassembled it nor ever having held a solenoid in one's hands and having applied tests to it?
Is this the basis for facts or just hearsay?
You do know, that your own K30 has the aperture-control-problem.
And you have collected a lot of data.