Originally posted by Papa_Joe The K-70 would be great, if it had the ergonomics of the K-3 and a shoulder LCD. But wait, that would be an K-3 with the sensor of the K-70? There will be one soon I guess.
As has been said, the K-70 is the current entry level camera of pentax. And please be aware, that it has features the competition only builds into its mid-range cameras.
The only improvement I would like to have for the K-70 as an entry level camera is native USB tethering.
OK, I admit it, more focusing points would be great, as well.
The K-70 is not an entry level camera. You can say Pentax doesn't make entry level DSLR's...
What camera brand's entry level models have Pentaprism VF, IBIS, pixel shift, fully articulated LCD screen, 2 control wheels, lens AF fine tuning, electronic levels, weather sealing, astrotracer and whatever else I missed?
Why would an experienced landscape photographer owning several Limited and * optics choose a K-70? I.e. ME
I could have bought a K3-ii or a KP but I didn't as I preferred the K-70.
My friend recently bought a Nikon D7200 and it doesn't have 1/2 the K-70 features but naturally better AF tracking that no Pentax body has. Adding more focus points to a Pentax camera, well there isn't that much point is there?