Originally posted by Zivelot Yep.... Pentax should seriously take into consideration what fans say. It seems they deliberately ignore any information they could find on forums.... if they wanted to find them. Their whole policy looks like a bunch of engineers who like to come up with new ideas but not bother further. Pair it with awful marketing and here you go. Anyway, what I'd like to see is:
Uncrippled KAF mount. Just to let you know Nikon has already listened to its customers. They've already put the Ai pin back on some of their DSLRs.
Full frame DSLR. Why is it so bloody difficult to build one. There is a considerate demand for a Pentax DSLR out there. One of my fellow Pentaxians who is in professional photography bitterly changed system because of this. He could not wait any longer.
TTL support. Yes... we'd like to use TTL again. It is better than P-TTL or at least as good.
Thanks Pentax.... if you ever listen to your followers....
I'm not sure how representative this and other forums are of Pentax users and potential buyers in general. I think that this audience is a little skewed toward people who are, for the most part, long-time Pentax users and serious photography enthusiasts. Pentax' market includes a lot of people who never visit this or any other internet photography forum. However, I think that they should at least take notice of what is said here. For all we know, they might lurk, but just not post.
I agree about the crippled KAF mount. How much cost could it add to re-introduce that little lever to determine the selected aperture on a K or M series lens? They already brag that you can use any Pentax 35mm SLR lens ever made. Why not make the backward compatibility complete?
Others have mentioned the ability to disable SDM and revert to screw drive. Nice, but probably isn't going to happen. That would be admitting defeat.
Full Frame is not a question of whether Pentax is capable of building one or not. It is a question of expected market share and development cost. There isn't even what I would call overwhelming demand on this and other forums, for a FF Pentax. There are those who want it, yes, but, again, this forum is not representative of the market as a whole. Pentax has around 8-10 percent of the worldwide dslr market. IIRC, polls have shown that fewer than half the posters on this forum truely want FF. FF dslr sales are a tiny percentage of overall sales, even for C & N. Realistically, how much of that market could Pentax take from them. There are constant rumors that Sony is, at best, breaking even in the FF dslr market, and they've got much deeper pockets than Hoya/Pentax.
TTL is probably a cost issue, although reportedly, the reason that they dropped it was that sensors don't reflect light the same way that film did. Actually, I would think that a digital sensor would be easier to do TTL with, since the sensor's reflectivity doesn't change. With film, it could change with every different film emulsion or manufacturer you used. And, it seemed to work well on the *istD and the first few Pentax dslrs. Personally, I think its really production costs and the fact that they spent a lot of money developing p-ttl (corporate ego).
But then, what do I know?
Paul Noble