Originally posted by fg-one One reason why I will not be buying a K3-III is bulk and weight. When comparing my Fuji X-T20 + 27 mm lens with my K5IIS + 21 mm lens, you are talking about 475 g vs 935 g. Carrying one camera or the other around your neck for a whole day are obviously very different experiences. I also like the EVF better, because it shows the actual picture that will be recorded. Talking about IQ, I think there has been marginal progress in sensor performance since 2010 and the Sony 16 mp sensor of the K5. To me, this minimal improvement is certainly not worth 2000 $. Looking at the IR or DPR tests, the 24 mp sensor of the X-T20 performs even better than the more recent 26 mp of the X-T4. Maybe the most recent cameras are valuable for people shooting sports because of their higher speed. I can still shoot sports using my K5IIS and manual pre-focusing. But frankly, the main reason for not buying a new camera is that it would not make me a better photographer.
You are of course, logically right in what you say. I bought a KP a couple of years ago because I "needed" a smaller, lighter camera than my K3 for my Ltd on other primes. However, my X-T1, even with a battery grip, with the 27mm attached is still smaller and lighter than the KP with a F 28mm f2.8, by some margin. And my XE3 even more so. Much as I love these Fujis though, I still get a kick out of using my Pentax gear, partly because I marginally prefer the Pentax images but also because I find something nice in use with the optical viewfinder and the general sense of denseness and excellent ergonomics of the bodies. Its not a logical thing, just a subjective feeling.
---------- Post added 04-14-21 at 12:10 AM ----------
Originally posted by robjmitchell I won’t be buying the K3III because I was just made redundant
I will hopefully be buying the K3III because if I can find a job quickly (2nd interview today) I will have a nice redundancy payout to leverage the wife against!
As a K3 user who has held out against the K1 and Kp, its not a difficult choice.
I can certainly empathize with your first and second statements here! I have been holding out against the K1 since it first came out, what is it, 5 years now? I was still prevaricating until the K3 iii arrived. The K1 does offer some considerable improvements to my K3, but at a cost, not just financial - bigger, heavier, slower, larger file sizes and no built in flash. Money aside (Ha,ha - always a consideration of course), the K3 iii would offer the improvements that matter to me most at only the expense of the missing flash.