Anyone really measured the UHS-II write speed in the camera?

gatorguy · 01-07-2022, 06:01 AM

Originally posted by idontstairs

The Nikon Z6 doesn't use a UHS-II card. I spent a day shooting 4k UHD in 97 degree high noon sunshine and couldn't get mine to overheat.

---------- Post added 01-06-22 at 10:44 PM ----------

I feel we are going in circles slapping a dead mirror here.

We will review again. Two known facts 1) The PentaxK-3iii camera has a UHS-II card slot. 2) The Pentax K-3iii camera doesn't utilize the full write speed of the UHS-II card slot.

Questions asked - Why doesn't Pentax use the full buffer? Why would Pentax purposely gimp the buffer?
.

It's pretty much true across the board that our current crop of cameras, Nikon, Canon, Fuji, Pentax, etc,, do not write to the UHS-II cards as fast as the standard allows. I already offered Nikon discussion links on the topic, and a tech paper that tested write speeds on the Canon R5 proved that most UHS-II cards are giving only about 60 percent the sustained write speed the standard allows for. Is it Nikon/Canon gimping their hardware? I have no idea. I just know what the tests are showing.

Last edited by gatorguy; 01-07-2022 at 07:16 AM.

JPT · 01-07-2022, 06:49 PM

I got my cards yesterday and tried to do a simple test as close to kwb's as possible, but I'm not as scientific or controlled.

The card is a Lexar Silver Series 1667x UHS II which claims 250MB/s read and 120MB/s writeon the package.

I found that it shot 40 images then slowed down for another 4. The wait until the write was completed was another 10 seconds. So I think this is close to the performance of the more expensive Gold Series card that kwb tested, and faster than the UHS I card.

gatorguy · 02-27-2022, 08:40 AM

Originally posted by Adam

I performed a test with this card:
Lexar 128GB Professional 1667x UHS-II SDXC Memory LSD128CBNA1667

With all corrections and AF disabled, shooting until the buffer filled up, the measured write speed averaged out to 91 Mb/s in raw in 84 Mb/s in raw+. Perhaps not cutting edge, but that is a 2x speedup over the K-3 II (and other recent APS-C models) and a 3x speedup over the K-1. I'd consider that a job well done by Pentax!

That's not far off from the max sustained write speeds for that card, 104 mb/s in actual performance testing. For giggles Adam could you try testing it with a smaller 32 or 64gb Lexar Profesional 2000x, or a Sony Tough, or Delkin 2000x? None of the cards ever perform to the package specs, but those three are among the fastest in actual use, hovering around 135-150mb/s on something like a Fuji XT3, 150-170mb/s on a Canon EOS-R.

The Pentax may indeed be far slower, but the actual write speeds in practice are all over the place from different brands with the same stated speed ratings on the package.

gatorguy · 03-14-2022, 07:33 AM

From my own tests today, and repeated several times to verify:
Sony tough UHS-II - 12.4 seconds to clear buffer after filling with approx 36 images in high-speed burst
Lexar 1667x UHS-II - 15.8 seconds to clear
Lexar 633x UHS-I - 38.8 seconds to clear

The Sony Tough was noticeably faster in practice than any of my other cards which include these UHS-II's: Sony Extreme Pro, Lexar 1667, ProGrade V60, Angelbird V60

**c.a.m** · 03-14-2022, 07:45 AM

Originally posted by gatorguy

From my own tests today, and repeated several times to verify:

Your results are similar to the test done by member @kwb, at post 51 above: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/210-pentax-k-3-iii/426099-anyone-really-...ml#post5487437

- Craig

red5isalive · 03-10-2023, 11:14 AM

That's a difficult matter to find the correct information online,

Some years ago I did found myself also willing to know this and found that website that I think is the best one in order to understand writting speeds:
Pentax K-3 II SD Card Write Speed Comparison of Fastest Memory Cards for the Pentax K3 II Digital Camera - Camera Memory Speed Comparison & Performance tests for SD and CF cards

BR,

**Urnamaster13** · 5 Days Ago

Considering that only 1 slot is UHS II, what could be the ideal way to use dual sd cards ? If we want to keep a live backup while shooting in 2nd card...

Should we use UHS I cards in both slot to maintain same speed ?

**bspn** · 5 Days Ago

Originally posted by Urnamaster13

Considering that only 1 slot is UHS II, what could be the ideal way to use dual sd cards ? If we want to keep a live backup while shooting in 2nd card...

Should we use UHS I cards in both slot to maintain same speed ?

Why would the cards being the same speed have any importance?

**Urnamaster13** · 5 Days Ago

Originally posted by bspn

Why would the cards being the same speed have any importance?

Will performance be same while shooting bursts if using a V30 card and V90 in different slots ?

gatorguy · 5 Days Ago

Originally posted by Urnamaster13

Will performance be same while shooting bursts if using a V30 card and V90 in different slots ?

Yes.

Use UHSII in both slots, or only in slot one. For simplicity I don't use UHS1 cards anymore except in my K-70, and then only because I don't want the ones I already had purchased going to waste. If you have two different speed UHSII cards put the faster one in slot 1. It can't hurt.

For what it's worth there have been other flagships with one slot faster than the other.

**bspn** · 5 Days Ago

Originally posted by gatorguy

Yes.

Use UHSII in both slots, or only in slot one. For simplicity I don't use UHS1 cards anymore except in my K-70, and then only because I don't want the ones I already had purchased going to waste. If you have two different speed UHSII cards put the faster one in slot 1. It can't hurt.

For what it's worth there have been other flagships with one slot faster than the other.

My thinking was if shooting raw to slot 1 and jpeg to slot 2, the file size difference should more than make up for the slower write in slot 2. If using card 1, and when it fills up, writing to card 2 may be a bit slower, but so what?

**Urnamaster13** · 5 Days Ago

Originally posted by gatorguy

Yes.

Use UHSII in both slots, or only in slot one. For simplicity I don't use UHS1 cards anymore except in my K-70, and then only because I don't want the ones I already had purchased going to waste. If you have two different speed UHSII cards put the faster one in slot 1. It can't hurt.

For what it's worth there have been other flagships with one slot faster than the other.

Considering k3-3 has 1 UHS-II slot and UHS-I slot, if i want to shoot with 2 cards, simulatenously writing to both in duplicates( RAW only) in case either one card fails...the speed should not be a problem while shooting bursts ?

i read in a post above you said that the Sony tough performed fastest. I am delibrating between getting it and the lexar 1667

**bspn** · 4 Days Ago

Originally posted by Urnamaster13

Considering k3-3 has 1 UHS-II slot and UHS-I slot, if i want to shoot with 2 cards, simulatenously writing to both in duplicates( RAW only) in case either one card fails...the speed should not be a problem while shooting bursts ?

i read in a post above you said that the Sony tough performed fastest. I am delibrating between getting it and the lexar 1667

I use the Lexar 1667 UHS-II in slot 1 and have been pleased. I have not done any time studies but I don't do long bursts and haven't noticed a buffer full scenario, yet. I have not had RAW writes to both cards simultaneously either.

01-07-2022, 06:49 PM	#62
JPT Pentaxian Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Tokyo Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,567	I got my cards yesterday and tried to do a simple test as close to kwb's as possible, but I'm not as scientific or controlled. The card is a Lexar Silver Series 1667x UHS II which claims 250MB/s read and 120MB/s writeon the package. I found that it shot 40 images then slowed down for another 4. The wait until the write was completed was another 10 seconds. So I think this is close to the performance of the more expensive Gold Series card that kwb tested, and faster than the UHS I card. Last edited by JPT; 01-07-2022 at 07:10 PM.

5 Days Ago	#72
Urnamaster13 Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Surat Photos: Albums Posts: 75	Originally posted by gatorguy Yes. Use UHSII in both slots, or only in slot one. For simplicity I don't use UHS1 cards anymore except in my K-70, and then only because I don't want the ones I already had purchased going to waste. If you have two different speed UHSII cards put the faster one in slot 1. It can't hurt. For what it's worth there have been other flagships with one slot faster than the other. Considering k3-3 has 1 UHS-II slot and UHS-I slot, if i want to shoot with 2 cards, simulatenously writing to both in duplicates( RAW only) in case either one card fails...the speed should not be a problem while shooting bursts ? i read in a post above you said that the Sony tough performed fastest. I am delibrating between getting it and the lexar 1667 Last edited by Urnamaster13; 5 Days Ago at 02:37 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Any drawbacks to using UHS-II cards in a UHS-I slot?	Qwntm	Pentax DSLR Discussion	13	11-30-2020 06:52 AM
The K-1 ii deserved a faster write to SD card, UHS-II speeds are simply not accurate	brainwave	Pentax DSLR Discussion	25	07-20-2020 10:57 AM
K1 and SDXC UHS-1 Memory Card Read Write Speeds	Kingman	Pentax K-1 & K-1 II	7	10-06-2019 07:55 PM
Can my K50 take advantage of the speed of Lexar Professional 2000x 32GB SDHC UHS-II/U	HGMerrill	Pentax K-30 & K-50	2	10-19-2016 09:54 PM
K-5 leveraging the write speed of the UHS-I SDXC Cards	brosen	Pentax K-5 & K-5 II	20	01-22-2013 12:46 AM

01-07-2022, 06:01 AM	#61
gatorguy Moderator Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Central Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,076	Originally posted by idontstairs The Nikon Z6 doesn't use a UHS-II card. I spent a day shooting 4k UHD in 97 degree high noon sunshine and couldn't get mine to overheat. ---------- Post added 01-06-22 at 10:44 PM ---------- I feel we are going in circles slapping a dead mirror here. We will review again. Two known facts 1) The PentaxK-3iii camera has a UHS-II card slot. 2) The Pentax K-3iii camera doesn't utilize the full write speed of the UHS-II card slot. Questions asked - Why doesn't Pentax use the full buffer? Why would Pentax purposely gimp the buffer? . It's pretty much true across the board that our current crop of cameras, Nikon, Canon, Fuji, Pentax, etc,, do not write to the UHS-II cards as fast as the standard allows. I already offered Nikon discussion links on the topic, and a tech paper that tested write speeds on the Canon R5 proved that most UHS-II cards are giving only about 60 percent the sustained write speed the standard allows for. Is it Nikon/Canon gimping their hardware? I have no idea. I just know what the tests are showing. Last edited by gatorguy; 01-07-2022 at 07:16 AM.

02-27-2022, 08:40 AM	#63
gatorguy Moderator Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Central Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,076	Originally posted by Adam I performed a test with this card: Lexar 128GB Professional 1667x UHS-II SDXC Memory LSD128CBNA1667 With all corrections and AF disabled, shooting until the buffer filled up, the measured write speed averaged out to 91 Mb/s in raw in 84 Mb/s in raw+. Perhaps not cutting edge, but that is a 2x speedup over the K-3 II (and other recent APS-C models) and a 3x speedup over the K-1. I'd consider that a job well done by Pentax! That's not far off from the max sustained write speeds for that card, 104 mb/s in actual performance testing. For giggles Adam could you try testing it with a smaller 32 or 64gb Lexar Profesional 2000x, or a Sony Tough, or Delkin 2000x? None of the cards ever perform to the package specs, but those three are among the fastest in actual use, hovering around 135-150mb/s on something like a Fuji XT3, 150-170mb/s on a Canon EOS-R. The Pentax may indeed be far slower, but the actual write speeds in practice are all over the place from different brands with the same stated speed ratings on the package.

03-14-2022, 07:33 AM	#64
gatorguy Moderator Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Central Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,076	From my own tests today, and repeated several times to verify: Sony tough UHS-II - 12.4 seconds to clear buffer after filling with approx 36 images in high-speed burst Lexar 1667x UHS-II - 15.8 seconds to clear Lexar 633x UHS-I - 38.8 seconds to clear The Sony Tough was noticeably faster in practice than any of my other cards which include these UHS-II's: Sony Extreme Pro, Lexar 1667, ProGrade V60, Angelbird V60

03-14-2022, 07:45 AM	#65
c.a.m Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Ottawa, Canada Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,790	Originally posted by gatorguy From my own tests today, and repeated several times to verify: Your results are similar to the test done by member @kwb, at post 51 above: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/210-pentax-k-3-iii/426099-anyone-really-...ml#post5487437 - Craig

03-10-2023, 11:14 AM	#66
red5isalive Pentaxian Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Barcelona Posts: 631	That's a difficult matter to find the correct information online, Some years ago I did found myself also willing to know this and found that website that I think is the best one in order to understand writting speeds: Pentax K-3 II SD Card Write Speed Comparison of Fastest Memory Cards for the Pentax K3 II Digital Camera - Camera Memory Speed Comparison & Performance tests for SD and CF cards BR,

5 Days Ago	#67
Urnamaster13 Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Surat Photos: Albums Posts: 75	Considering that only 1 slot is UHS II, what could be the ideal way to use dual sd cards ? If we want to keep a live backup while shooting in 2nd card... Should we use UHS I cards in both slot to maintain same speed ?

5 Days Ago	#68
bspn Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2021 Location: Northern MI Posts: 307	Originally posted by Urnamaster13 Considering that only 1 slot is UHS II, what could be the ideal way to use dual sd cards ? If we want to keep a live backup while shooting in 2nd card... Should we use UHS I cards in both slot to maintain same speed ? Why would the cards being the same speed have any importance?

5 Days Ago	#69
Urnamaster13 Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Surat Photos: Albums Posts: 75	Originally posted by bspn Why would the cards being the same speed have any importance? Will performance be same while shooting bursts if using a V30 card and V90 in different slots ?

5 Days Ago	#70
gatorguy Moderator Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Central Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 5,076	Originally posted by Urnamaster13 Will performance be same while shooting bursts if using a V30 card and V90 in different slots ? Yes. Use UHSII in both slots, or only in slot one. For simplicity I don't use UHS1 cards anymore except in my K-70, and then only because I don't want the ones I already had purchased going to waste. If you have two different speed UHSII cards put the faster one in slot 1. It can't hurt. For what it's worth there have been other flagships with one slot faster than the other.

5 Days Ago	#71
bspn Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2021 Location: Northern MI Posts: 307	Originally posted by gatorguy Yes. Use UHSII in both slots, or only in slot one. For simplicity I don't use UHS1 cards anymore except in my K-70, and then only because I don't want the ones I already had purchased going to waste. If you have two different speed UHSII cards put the faster one in slot 1. It can't hurt. For what it's worth there have been other flagships with one slot faster than the other. My thinking was if shooting raw to slot 1 and jpeg to slot 2, the file size difference should more than make up for the slower write in slot 2. If using card 1, and when it fills up, writing to card 2 may be a bit slower, but so what?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

4 Days Ago	#73
bspn Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2021 Location: Northern MI Posts: 307	Originally posted by Urnamaster13 Considering k3-3 has 1 UHS-II slot and UHS-I slot, if i want to shoot with 2 cards, simulatenously writing to both in duplicates( RAW only) in case either one card fails...the speed should not be a problem while shooting bursts ? i read in a post above you said that the Sony tough performed fastest. I am delibrating between getting it and the lexar 1667 I use the Lexar 1667 UHS-II in slot 1 and have been pleased. I have not done any time studies but I don't do long bursts and haven't noticed a buffer full scenario, yet. I have not had RAW writes to both cards simultaneously either.