Originally posted by Kobayashi.K
but the truth is there is long list of strange design failures on this camera.
Would it be fair to distinguish between design "failures" and design
compromises? Or distinguish "design failures" and
potential system failures?
Originally posted by Kobayashi.K
The split-rings supplied with the camera, for mounting the strap, have a construction fault, exposing the bare wire-ends to the inside of a mounted strap, potentially causing fraying of it after some time.
The metal rings on my K-5 II and K-3 II appear to have the same construction as the ones on my K-3 Mark III (without the plastic wrap-around), and I believe this has been a standard design for years on various brands. Like you, I wondered about these D-rings several years ago when I was doing my monthly camera check, but concluded that fraying would be improbable. I don't recall finding any reports of failures in the type of flat strap that I use, and I have not noticed any fraying on the strap, which I've used on all three cameras.
I think I had seen a couple of reports of fraying or breakage in the small-diameter cords that were used in an early version of the Peak Design anchor clip.
Originally posted by Kobayashi.K
The strap lug on the left side is too close to the Mode dial on top. The camera tends to tilt forward quickly even with a light lens, so the strap is easily bouncing into the Mode dial when walking around. That could lead to a failure of the mode dial in due course.
I use a custom-made, flexible, 10-mm wide nylon strap to attach to my K-3 Mark III; its other end attaches to a Domke Gripper neck strap. It clears the Mode dial, but just barely. Perhaps another style of strap would cause a problem as you have described.
- Craig