Originally posted by Canada_Rockies Why not, I wonder? Is it because the 50/1.4 does not have the flat field optics of a dedicated macro lens? I use my K 50mm extension whenever I need the boost in close up. I use it most often with my 400/5.6 to get closer than 5 metres and with my 100/4 macro when I need to get closer than 1:2, which is not often.
That's the reason. However, its still not bad. However, I either put the M 50mm/1.7 on the K 50 or the Macro-Tak 50mm/4 and the latter is already 1:1. That is focus rail territory. I also have the kenko AF tube and I have tried the FA 50/1.4 with it and FA 77mm. The FA or F 1.7 would be a better choice but I don't have either of those. In fact, since I have both of these tubes, I have been meaning to sell Pentax manual K set.