Originally posted by RockvilleBob I just bought a Pentax Bellows II for 39.99 including shipping. I have several m42 lenses and a Pentax adapter. From what I read this is a very good unit mechanically and I thought the price was good.
Good unit, good price, congrats. Here's some relevant info:
We think of 'macro' as very-close-up shooting. Conservatives define macro a 1:1 (lifesize) or more magnification. Liberals allow for 1:2 (half-size). Crass capitalist lensmakers call lenses that only reach 1:4 'macro', probably because it's sexier and uses less ink than CLOSE FOCUS. And with vanishingly few exceptions, any zoom called 'macro', isn't.
Macro PHOTOGRAPHY means shooting at magnification. Macro LENS has another implication: edge-to-edge flatfield sharpness. Most camera lenses have some field curvature; this can help make an image 'pop'. But if we're shooting flat subjects where the entire field matters, we can't have that. Macro lenses, enlarger lenses, reversed lenses, all have such edge perfection.
If shooting non-flat subjects where image edges don't matter, a camera lens on extension (bellows and/or tubes) may be just fine. If edges matter, then macro or enlarger or reversed lenses do the trick. I love enlarger lenses (ELs): cheap, sharp, cheap, small, cheap. Did I mention that they don't cost much? But old M42 camera lenses are a good place to start. Beware: some Fuji and Meyer|Pentacon and others are auto-only, with an auto-aperture pin but no M/A switch. These only shoot wide-open and so aren't the most useful for macros.
Is a saying that macro photographers are the happiest of camera workers. Are we happy yet?