Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-08-2013, 12:33 PM   #1
Junior Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London
Posts: 32
CPL+hood=unnecessary?

Good spring evening all,
I have recently been inspired to explore the realm of polarised light. My question is this:
When using a circular polarising filter, is it necessary to also use a hood to prevent flare and maintain contrast or does the nature of the CLP prevent internal reflection?

The lens I will be using the CPL with is the DA40xs which I use with a fastidious plastic mount lens hood. Being only a 27 mm filter thread, I will not be able to reach inside the hood to adjust the CPL and having a plastic mount, detaching and replacing the hood is a pain in the ass!

Many people here say using a hood with the 40xs is not necessary and half the reason I choose to is to protect the front element.

Thank you for reading ,
Jay

03-08-2013, 12:37 PM   #2
Veteran Member
JinDesu's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New York City
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,632
A CPL will block the majority of angled lighting except those that are parallel to the polarizing elements. This does increase contrast. While this is good, the bad is that you lose out on a lot of direct light also, which cuts your exposure by 1 or 2 stops. This, in addition to the loss of image quality in a cheaper polarizer, may mean that a hood may just be better overall.

A CPL will not internally reflect if it is multicoated, I believe.
03-08-2013, 01:27 PM   #3
Pentaxian
bdery's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Quebec city, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,651
QuoteOriginally posted by Mr Manual Quote
does the nature of the CLP prevent internal reflection?
To answer that specific part of the question, no. Another glass interface will increase reflections, though you might not see it in every shot. There is no way to decrease total internal reflections by adding glass. You need to remove glass or add coatings.
03-08-2013, 01:27 PM   #4
dms
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New York, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,133
PL will stop non-polarized (and thus randomly reflected light of a surface if the incident light is polarized) but that does not prevent the filter glass from causing reflections/glare. To reduce that you use the hood.

If anything with the filter (any filter!) the hood is even more necessary, as you have more potentially reflecting surfaces. If the PL was perfect (an impossibility) you still need the hood--it's as though the filter wasn't there.

03-08-2013, 02:39 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,183
What kind of photography will you be using this for? Since you are using a polarizer you will probably have to take the time to rotate it and stuff anyway, so you might as well shield the lens with your hand or something. Which polarizer are you getting btw? A 27mm one, or are you using step up rings?
03-08-2013, 03:11 PM   #6
Pentaxian
Kozlok's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Albuquerque
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,095
Lens tip did a big CPL study. Some filters cause no change in flare, some make it worse. Review here:

Polarizing filters test - Introduction - Lenstip.com
03-09-2013, 02:32 PM   #7
Junior Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London
Posts: 32
Original Poster
Thank you all for your hasty and well informed responses. If I am to by a CPL, I will probably go with B+W unless the very thorough study Kozlok has referenced gives me reason to choose otherwise. With good glass coming at a good price I would buy a 49mm CPL as I would be able to use it on my M501.7 also. Obviously, doing this would mean getting a 27-49 step-up ring which would also have the advantage of allowing me to use a 49mm hood meaning I could reach inside the hood and adjust the CPL
I live in a seaside town in Cornwall and would be using the CPL to hopefully do justice to the local scenery: deep blue skies and seas with detailed granite rock faces which lose their majesty to haze incurred through distance. I don't intend to shoot orthodox landscapes, more so seaside photography with a human element.

Thank you all again,
Jay
The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of understanding - The Kybalion

03-09-2013, 03:11 PM   #8
dms
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New York, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,133
A circular hood would likely be fine and would then work for both lenses--and turning the hood would turn the PL.

The standard hood for the 50mm f1.7 should do OK for both. I did not actually try it--but the standard 50mm f/1.4 Nikon hoods work on my 28mm super takumar, so likely OK on the 40mm.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
cpl, filter, hood, lens, plastic, tripod
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison; Hood, CPL, ND Filter rbefly Photographic Technique 6 12-12-2012 05:24 PM
Wanted - Acquired: Heliopan 58mm Screw-In Hood (Short); B+W MRC CPL / ND Filters chickenandavocado Sold Items 2 10-23-2011 06:02 AM
People unnecessary risk Lord Awesome Post Your Photos! 17 10-12-2009 09:28 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top