Originally posted by Miguel You haven't shared what equipment you would be mounting on a tripod so assssing weight and stability is more based on assumptions and our needs rather than yours. I also cannot tell if you will be driving to shooting sites or packing your gear on foot.
I sold a cf Gitzo because I preferred a cf Manfrotto. I think you have to consider if closeup photography is in the cards as the 190 series has wonderfully quick center column conversion. I also prefer the locking levers of the Manfrotto because it provides visual confirmation of engagement. Twisty locking is dumb design to me. Sometimes I am in a hurray to setup for a shot, and it is easy to get distracted and bypass tightening a lock. I almost lost a very expensive combo that way & the next week sold the Gitzo.
That ball head looks pretty complicated to me. Heavy too. What are the requirements driving that choice?
The issue with some Manfrotto ball heads is that their releases are proprietary, rather that Arca compatible. I think the Acratech Ultimate Ballhead is hard to beat for its simple design, standard interfaces, light weight, and cleanability.
All of your choices are really good by themselves--it is the fit with your needs that matters most.
M
Hi Miguel
Thanks for your answer.
You are right, I've forgotten to mention my heavy set up, which is: Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (1.6Kg) + K7 with grip attached and 2 batteries (aprox 1 Kg) + 1.7TC (aprox .2Kg); lets say 3 Kg in total.
If you have time, please take a look at the gitzo's center column, it can be set up at every direction and has a hook.
About 190 series, I wasn't able to find if it is capable to support a 70-200mm lens and this item is MUST for me.
Regarding the ball head, I've chosen this because the load capacity and, the most important issue, the hexagonal plate type shape is very much stable whit heavy load, I mean, it is quiete imposible that it slides (professionals say that
).
I'll have to think about twist lock.....
I always carry my stuff on foot
Chears