Originally posted by asharpe I have heard so much about Gitzo, though, and B&H now has $150 rebates on the 1542T, making it more attractive, and barely in-budget. I *probably* couldn't go wrong by getting one, right? You wouldn't recommend the Nest over the 1542T, would you? How about a 3LT Brian over the 1542T? But 5 Sections?!! And what about the CT114 Induro? Would you get that over a Nest?
Well, once you're looking at a bunch of good tripods, it really is up to you.
Thing is, I'm not the best person to give purchasing advice when it comes to well-respected brands: I can afford a BMW, but I drive a Hyundai because it does 95% of what the other does for less than half the price. (Modern Hyundais don't suck, really!) I'm sure there are intangibles that I'm missing by not tooling around in an X5, but if I don't notice it every day, then who am I to care, right?
In that sense, Gitzo is the BMW of the tripod world: very well made, engineered to the limit (particularly the latest models), but without the expensive upkeep of a Bimmer.
Thing is, most photographers won't need or use all the intangibles (and tangibles) that a Gitzo has to offer. I've
extensively tested the GT1544T (the more compact version of the 1542T) and it is a wonderful tripod that basically punches above its weight and size.
Speaking of size, Gitzo does something that a lot of other companies imitate. They separate their products by size and how much they can carry with the shorthand of a "Series" with a number. Series 1 is usually the smallest (GT
1542), with 24mm diameter top tubes (and a suitably lower weight rating), while Series 2 (GT
2542) has 28mm tubes, and Series 3 has 34mm, etc. For Induro, roughly the same specs follow CT114, CT
214, CT
314, etc. See what they did there? 3LT has the Brian (25mm tubes) then the Eddie (29mm tubes) and other totally non-descriptive names, while Nest puts the tube size in the name (NT-6294C is "
Nest
Tripod
6,
29mm tube,
4 sections,
Carbon fiber") So the Nest tripod we've been talking about is a "Series 2" in terms of size and weight and load, but they also make a 6245C which is smaller all around.
Would I buy one over another? Yes, because I know what
I need
for this type of tripod among the ones that I already have (Series 2 size and weight capacity, but relatively compact and tall). That was easy for me, because my old Feisol fit the bill for a decade, and I just needed a new one! Rather than buy another Feisol, I took a chance on the relatively unknown Nest brand, just like I did in 2004 with the relatively unknown Feisol brand, or before that with the relatively unknown Markins brand (hint, Feisol and Markins are not "unknown" anymore!). Hey, I shoot with Pentax, so I'm not a follow-the-leader type of consumer by definition!
One more thing, the Induro tripods do not fold up as small as the Gitzo Travelers, 3LT's, Feisols, or Nest because their legs do not fold up 180° around the center column. Also, the difference between a Gitzo Mountaineer and a Traveler (which may even have the same number, like 1542) is that the Mountaineer cannot flip its legs around for compact packing. Speaking of which, Giottos makes YTL "Silk Road" tripods which have a non-round center column designed for even more compact packing! Finally, I'd go with 4 sections or fewer, since I prefer stability over packed size.