Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-31-2015, 10:31 PM   #1
Senior Member
kentster's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bremerton, Washington
Posts: 287
Filter/Lense Protection question

I need to get a couple lens protectors for some newly acquired lenses. Do you all just go with a simple UV lens protector or something different?

There appears to be many different options.

07-31-2015, 10:56 PM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 50,374
A UV filter's fine as long as it's not a cheap one that'll degrade your image quality. Hoods are also a great way to protect your lenses.

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover these costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, KEH, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

08-01-2015, 12:18 AM   #3
Veteran Member
hks_kansei's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 828
UV filters.

pretty much all of mine are secondhand, since most of my lenses are as well.

But yeah, just a UV filter and if it gets a mark or anything bin it.



Really depends what you need protection from, a hard hood does a great job for most things, but if it's dust/mist etc you need protection from a filter is best.
08-01-2015, 02:45 AM - 1 Like   #4
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,038
Two schools of thought here, one being use plain (or UV) filters to protect the lens front element, the other just use the hood.

I'm a 'hood' person, and never once in now 50 years of photography have I had damage to the front element of any of my lenses.

Why do I rely on the hood? Adding another layer of glass to a lens, however good the filter quality, is likely to degrade the IQ.

In any event, the lens coatings are designed not just to improve image quality but also to protect the front element against oil from fingers, etc.

08-01-2015, 03:50 AM   #5
Tas
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,179
Filters on, but not when I shoot

I always use a hood but also have UV filters fitted to almost all my lenses.

I rarely take photos with the UV filters on unless I believe there will be the need to protect the front element. For example, if I'm taking images near the sea and there's a lot of wind there'll be spray and I'd rather accept a slight loss of image quality than need to clean salt spray from a lens. I also leave them on in particularly dusty conditions. Often if it's really windy I'll be looking at the environment and seeing what can become airborne and become layered on the front lens element.

So I leave UV filters on all my lenses so they're always there and I only use them if I think they will add protection to the lens in certain conditions.

I don't have a UV filter fitted to my Zeiss 2/50 lens, though this means I won't use that lens in conditions that I coould result in leaving sgnificant amounts of dust or salt spray on the front lens element.

These are my preferences and I think a good compromise for the protection of assets that I can't replace.

Tas
08-01-2015, 04:54 AM   #6
Insanely humble
Loyal Site Supporter
savoche's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lowlands of Norway
Posts: 17,536
I'm a "hood only" person, but each to their own
08-01-2015, 05:02 AM   #7
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
clackers's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Albums
Posts: 15,210
Hoods and caps for mine.

08-01-2015, 05:40 AM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
acoufap's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,871
It would bother me a lot if scratches would apear on the front glas elements. I don't expect IQ degradation when using good UV filters. So I use them - B&W or Hoya. For my DA15 this is a must have because the integrated lens hood shifts backward easily resulting in no protection.
08-01-2015, 06:40 AM   #9
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2014
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 803
I use a hood now. I dropped my camera and lens with a filter on it once and it took 2 days trying to get it off. It fell out of my camera bag and hit right on the corner of the lens and made the filter "pop" a thread, so it took a lot of work getting it off and I really thought I would need to buy a new lens. I'd rather use a hood now.
08-01-2015, 07:59 AM   #10
Veteran Member
K57XR's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 830
I still have to acquire a hood for my DA*16-50 but I use this: B+W 77mm XS-Pro Clear MRC-Nano 007 Filter 66-1066111 B&H Photo
and this one on the 18-135 (and hood): Hoya 62mm HD Protective Filter XHD62PROTEC

It's quite a bit more expensive but comparing the two brands side by side I prefer the B&W over the Hoya. They're both very good but build quality seems a bit better overall with B&W. Images with and w/o these protectors to my eyes do not see any difference/degradation. No vignetting at the wide end either for both protectors. I highly recommend against generic branded filters especially ones you might find dirt cheap on ebay.

Last edited by K57XR; 08-01-2015 at 08:17 AM.
08-01-2015, 08:47 AM   #11
Veteran Member
Fat Albert's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 964
QuoteOriginally posted by acoufap Quote
It would bother me a lot if scratches would apear on the front glas elements.
It's much more difficult to scratch a front element than you think--at least the modern lenses, anyway.
08-01-2015, 09:52 AM   #12
Senior Member
kentster's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bremerton, Washington
Posts: 287
Original Poster
I had a UV "protector" on the front of my expensive Tamron lens. Went to pull it form the bag and it was shattered. I do not recall any drama to the lens or bag that would have caused the damage. I ended up having to ship the lens to Tamron and spend $350 to get it repaired. So...i'm pondering the hood approach as well
08-01-2015, 10:42 AM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 176
QuoteOriginally posted by kentster Quote
I need to get a couple lens protectors for some newly acquired lenses. Do you all just go with a simple UV lens protector or something different?

There appears to be many different options.
This article: UV filters test - Introduction - Lenstip.com
is a bit old but the most comprehensive test of these things that I have seen. The general gist is that the Hoya HMC UV filter is as good as anything else and not the most expensive. I use UV filters on my lenses, which I remove when using a polarizer. I also use a lens hood unless for some reason it interferes with what I am trying to do. When the lens is in the camera bag, I reverse the hood and add the lens cap.
08-01-2015, 12:12 PM   #14
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Canada_Rockies's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,201
I no longer even own a "protective" filter. After 30 years or so of photography, I stopped using them, and have had no damage whatsoever to my lenses in extensive use. I do use a hood, always, and put lens caps on when I put them in the bag. Some years (many?) a reviewer advised that use of protective filters is 50/50: half of us use them and half don't. Don't forget that media photographers often use the "spit on the lens and wipe it off with your tie" lens cleaning system. My opinion (which is worth exactly what you have just paid for it) is that they are an unnecessary expense and complication.
08-02-2015, 01:14 AM   #15
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 21,057
For the person using the da 15 with a filter have you shot both ways? I found even with a polarizer in many lighting conditions I got odd flare only when using a filter.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, lens, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax FA*250-600 front protection filter CertEdFriday Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 03-05-2017 03:39 PM
HD da 20-40mm Ldt Super Protect (SP) coating and protection filter cake Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 05-15-2015 04:54 PM
Is it stupid to buy a cheap protection filter? krissow Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 18 01-07-2014 03:46 PM
Lens protection question (filter) Igilligan Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 14 04-01-2008 09:13 AM
UV or Plain Protection Filter calicojack Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 6 03-20-2008 06:54 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:58 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top