Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-26-2015, 03:36 PM   #1
Junior Member




Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 40
Tripod Slik 500DX vs 780DX

Hey

I am considering to buy tripod and torn between Slik 500DX and 780DX.
Mainly for landscape and maybe some studio.

780DX is high, so for me being about 6 feet (about 183 cm) tall is good feature. also I prefer viewfinder over live view so high tripod is valued again.
On other hand 780DX is quite heavy carrying it for long trips could be exhausting. I think I can forgot about carrying it for holiday trip on a plane.

500DX is cheaper and also more compact but is also shorter so I think it could be drawback.

Any suggestions Guys?
Maybe somebody has used 500DX or 780DX?

Greets

10-26-2015, 04:41 PM   #2
Forum Member




Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 97
I prefer the larger of the 2 tripods because of my height. The additional load capacity helps stability a lot.

You might also consider the older model (Slik Pro DX700). It has the same capacity as the 780, is just as solid and is on sale at B&H for $139. The 700 uses the round plates, which many people really like. They make setting up fast and easy, especially in low light.
10-26-2015, 06:11 PM   #3
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
Loyal Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 31,024
Whichever you decide on, I would suggest considering purchase of legs only. Unless you really want the 3-way tilt/pan head that is bundled, you will likely find a ballhead with Arca-Swiss QR separately offers better utility.

I own the 330DX which I purchased with bundled head (the same SH-705E unit as on the 500DX). The head is decent, but fairly heavy (about 1lb) for what it is. I put the head on the shelf and replaced it with a higher capacity ballhead at less than half the weight.

In regards to the 700DX vs. 780DX, the main difference is the quality of the bundled pan head. If you are partial to that style of head, the price difference may be worth it.

In either case, I would suggest seeing the tripods in person if you have access to a brick 'n mortar store that stocks Slik. There is so much more than what you can tell from a specification list and and catalog description.


Steve
10-27-2015, 12:06 AM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Slovenia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,184
QuoteOriginally posted by Hamiltom Quote
The 700 uses the round plates, which many people really like.
That's exactly the thing that stopped me from buying that tripod. Numerous people complained that the plate rotated under the camera's weight when the head was tilted.

10-28-2015, 12:47 PM   #5
Junior Member




Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 40
Original Poster
Unfortunately I cannot check that tripods near my home. I found 780DX, 700DX and 500DX at internet store with good bargain price. Read that generally that tripods have good reviews, but bulkiness of 700DX and 780DX deters me from purchase.
Also you wrote that 700DX has round plate issues, o maybe 780DX is better

I considered also tripods Velbon Sherpa series like E5300D series or 5370D (with better minimal height).

Greets
10-28-2015, 01:59 PM   #6
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,206
I have the older Slik 700dx here. It uses the Puk system.
The tripod is very strong, but too heavy to carry far from the trunk of the car..
As for the loose puks comment, I suspect the user did not know that the socket is adjustable.
I have a mix of original puks and some home brew ones.
The mount can easily hold the heaviest MF cameras here , for example the 4x5 Speed and the RB67.
The below photos show, firstly the adjusting mechanism which winds a cam out to grip the puk.
The mount socket is machined out of a cast aluminum block.
The adjustment is by removing a plastic cover and rotating a knurled wheel with a larger screwdriver.

When adjusted properly, I dare say if the camera was forcibly rotated,
the 1/4 inch thread would tear out of the camera long before that puk would move.

I have no hesitation in suspending a heavy camera vertically down, or rotating it up 90 degrees (as shown).
Also the mount has an "emergency" catch so that the camera won't fall if the clamping lever is released accidentally.
Attached Images
   
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
slik, slik 500dx vs, tripod, tripod slik 500dx
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Slik U-212 Tripod jake14mw Sold Items 6 07-10-2015 12:08 PM
For Sale - Sold: Slik sprint tripod Fl_Gulfer Sold Items 2 12-09-2011 09:32 PM
For Sale - Sold: SLIK PRO 330DX Tripod (Black Finish) + SLIK SH-705E 3-Way Pan Head (with Bag) omega leader Sold Items 4 09-11-2010 05:10 PM
For Sale - Sold: Slik 813 CF II carbon fiber tripod + tripod head (Australia) Edvinas Sold Items 5 08-02-2009 04:56 PM
For Sale - Sold: Slik PRO 500dx kbrabble Sold Items 1 03-14-2007 08:24 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top