Originally posted by mayoapo I wonder why CRV-3 batteries cannot be used in the K200D,i used them with my K100D,and they worked great.
Simple. they won't fit
on the 6MP DSLRs, each battery section (for either 2 AAs or 1 CR-V3) has a flat side and a side with a ridge. the flat side is there to accommodate the flat side of the CR-V3, the ridge is there to accommodate the groove in the CRV3, and to separate the AAs in each bay
on the K200D, there's ridges on both sides. CR-V3s are just not going to fit. Length and weathersealing wouldn't be an issue with CR-V3s if the camera body was designed to take them. However, the K200D was not designed for them
not that i'd lament over it. a 4 pack of energizer Lithium AAs is the same price as 1 CR-V3 primary down here (and remember, you need 2 CR-V3s to run the camera) . a set of 2 rechargable regulated CR-V3s and chargers (enough to keep one 6MP DSLR running) is the same cost as one genuine Canon 40D battery, and enough to get you 3 sets of Powerex 2700s and a decent Delta-V charger
Originally posted by dosdan I think it's more about their voltage discharge slope compared to Ni-MH, rather than absolute capacity
You're right. it's Li-ion's voltage discharge slope, both for self discharge and under load. that's why you don't need as high a capacity with Li-ions than you do with Ni-MH
no battery technology is perfect, and Lithium-ion does have it's flaws. They'll kill themselves within 2 years or so, they don't like being kept on charge 24-7 (remember the apple ipod battery controversy? they kept their ipods charged in the dock. that's the reason for the failing batteries), they don't like lots of full-charge to discharge to full charge cycles, and when put in the wrong situation (electrical short, faulty charger, damage to the cells), they blow up.
Originally posted by dosdan Maybe someone who has a K200D can comment. It may still be possible, although it may compromise the weathersealing (at least from the bottom - may not be that important).
Yeah, it'll compromise the weather sealling.. your battery door would be open :P
Originally posted by danielchtong I had a long thread on this controversial subject. Well Pentax is not recommending that . But Samsung happens to have made the best RCRV3 as shown.
Daniel
the reason Pentax don't recommend rechargable CR-V3s is because of Lithium-ion/Lithium Polymer's native voltage
3.7-4.2 volts. 3.8 nominal.
I get about 4.1 on the 18650s i've gotten from DX for my Cree flashlight. my 2S1P Lipos in my RC car are 7.2v (hense the 2S1P, 2 Serial, 1 Parallel). Look at your cell phone battery. that's generally a single cell 1S1P Lithium-Ion battery. chances are that it's 3.7v too.
the samsung battery in that thread of yours, rice's rechargable CR-V3 and dosdan's ones are all regulated. that is, there's a regulation circuit inside the battery that drops its' output voltage to 3v.
not every rechargeable CR-V3 battery does that. and putting 3.8-4.1v into your camera is, unless pentax designed their power delivery circuitry to be this robust, a recipe for failure. having not risked it with my cameras, i don't know the real life application of using a non-regulated rechargeable CR-V3 as i'm not willing to risk my camera by doing that
Now that my *ist DS has been resigned to backup duties, i might get one. though for 120 for a set of 2 Uniross ones with chargers, it's not top of my priority list. importing from overseas isn't much cheaper, and i'm not going to get it from cheap places like DX cause there's a huge chance that they're not regulated batteries...
Originally posted by Tom S. In the ist-D I gave my daughter, fresh charged rechargeables will last for around 70 shots while alkaline will do a little over 100.
3 reasons for that
1: batteries left in the camera for a long time
2: the charger isn't fully charging the batteries
3: there's something wrong with your AA rechargable batteries
I've done about 500 on my K200D today alone. not even showing half. Mind you, i pulsed the batteries before, so i knew they were fully charged.
Under high load, the NiMH will beat alkalines. However, their self discharge rates leave a lot to be desired.
Long life Ni-MH batteris, (Uniross Hybros, Varta long life, eneloops, Imedions, etc) have better discharge rates (something like 10% per year, as opposed to 3% per day), but have smaller capacities (2000-2100mAh, vs 2500+)
Originally posted by Tom S. I have not tried rechargable lithium in 'standard' battery sizes (in fact weren't even aware of them), so I can't speak one way or the other.
don't, unless you want a dead camera. Again, AA sized lithium Ion batteries are 3.7 volts, 3 times the voltage of a rechargable AA, more than 2 times the voltage of an alkaline AA
Link from a battery supplier i use talking about Li-ion AA
Rechargeable Regulated CR-V3s are a thought for the 6MP DSLR generation, and i'm sure they're pretty good, but i'm just worried about if the regulator circuit fails. i've had protection circuits fail in rechargeable CR123 and 18650 Li-ion batteries and i just don't want to risk it in something that i can ill afford to replace
I don't get how people complain about battery weight in cameras. i can't tell the difference between when i have AA lithiums or rechargeable 2700s in my camera. Last time i checked, there was a marginal difference of (i think) 75ish grams between my Sanyo 2500s and Energiser AAs. I know you can tell the difference when you hold the batteries by themselves in your hands. It could be just me, but when those batteries are inside a 1.5 kilo camera rig (*ist DS, 18-200, AF540FGZ) , i can't tell the difference.