Hi photogem,
Originally posted by photogem This 4-th contact is law in Japan since Nov. 2011 and all batteries and chargers sold in Japan have to have them since Jan. 2012
The 4-th contact is not a requirement as far as I understand. But I'm no expert of any law, it's possible, even likely, that I don't know what I'm talking about.
I'd appreciate if you point me to the right law concerning this.
First of all, Ricoh sells 3-contact Li ion batteries incl. but not limited to DB110 for GRIII in Japan. That battery didn't even exist in 2012.
https://ricohimagingstore.com/libattery-db-110-s0037835.html
As a sign of conformance to the law, they're required to display PSE mark on Li ion batteries these days. It's illegal to sell Li ion battery w/o PSE mark. Unsurprisingly DB110 has the mark.
https://review.kakaku.com/review/K0001133714/ReviewCD=1304541/ImageID=505851/
The law (Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act in Japan) defines a set of tests that Li ion batteries have to pass, but
doesn't say anything about specifics of safety implementations (e.g. number of contacts). Here's the testing part of the Act (in Japanese).
https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/consumer/seian/denan/kaishaku/gijutsukijunkais...eppyoudai9.pdf If something passes the tests and they put the PSE mark, that's the end of the story as far as legality goes.
There's nothing illegal for Ricoh or third party manufacturer or importer to sell 3-contact Li ion batteries in Japan as far as they pass the tests.
Third party D-LI90 clones with PSE mark despite having only 3 contacts do exist. Such brands often specifically mention that their batteries conform to Japanese law, though of course I cannot prove that they're speaking truthfully.
OEM D-LI90P sold in Japan has four contacts and PSE mark, and it's illegal to sell OEM D-LI90 and D-LI90E (both have 3 contacts) w/o PSE mark. Why Ricoh didn't put PSE mark on the latter two is anybody's guess. If you have a definitive answer, not just a guess, I'm really interested to hear.
The charger is a different topic that I don't know about as far as the law is concerned.
Anyway, that's my understanding. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, that would be honestly appreciated.