Originally posted by pentaxfall Recently I was strongly thinking about buying one. Two factors made me not be buy.
-GND expects horizon to be flat.
-Setting up square filter involves more steps and that becomes an excuse for not using them at all. I will stick with software based solution.
I spent time reading and experimenting with ENFUSE. Exposure Fusion and Tone Mapping are two popular methods for doing s/w HDR. I like the output from Exposure Fusion. Both methods compramise saturation so I will use HDR only when there are no other options. I do not like to give up saturation. Yes one can boost the saturation is PP but I do not like that route.
Yeah I am concerned about the amount of times I'd have completely flat horizons in which to use one successfully without needing to resort to PP corrections, which then begs the question whether it's worth it if you're spending a good deal of time in post recovering a mountain peak or what not. And yeah I am not too gung ho about square filter set up times, however, I don't much enjoy my currently fiddling of ND filters on and off a lens, perhaps it would still be in my best interest to migrate across to a system that can accommodate all my glass.
I have not heard of the term 'Exposure Fusion' before, thanks for that, I shall read up about it. It's quite possible I've used the techniques in the past without knowing what they are properly called