Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-14-2008, 09:30 AM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 728
Alienbees CyberSync Radio Triggers

I’ve been using the AlienBee CyberSync’s for about 5-6 months now and thought I would share my thoughts as there is limited information out there for these little buggers, and a while back I said I would.

Paul Buff and his Company: I think I’ll open this mini review with the experience I had purchasing the Cybersyncs. I ordered them online, and it automatically gave me an expected ship date. No problemo. The next day I get a call from customer service, they wanted to let me know that due to some error they would ship a day later, a single day, than what they had told me. A real person called me, not an email, not a recorded message, some places wouldn’t even let you know that there is a slight shipping delay. I don’t care about the delay and I’m very impressed that they would actually give me a quick call to let me know, speaks volumes about the company, to me at least.

The CyberSyncs:

In the Box: Both items come packaged in small/simple boxes. The transmitter comes with a button battery installed and a short cable to connect it to a PC port. The receiver also comes packaged with a longer (4') mini plug to PC cable.



Size/Build Quality/Initial Impressions: I’ve briefly used Pocket Wizards before, and had a chance to handle them so I had a baseline to compare size. These Cybersyncs are TINY. Which I really like. The transmitter is quite unobtrusive compared to the PW’s. The CS receiver is larger but still a good size considering the application. Most of it’s bulk is taken up by the 2 AA batteries it houses(the transmitter runs off of a button cell).





The build quality lags behind the PW’s, the CSs just don’t feel as robust, but this is a double-edged sword because you are going to give up some durability in favor of a smaller size, and I think the compromise was a good one. The CS units seem like they will stand up just fine for their size. Besides, the receiver is so small and light it doesn’t hit the ground as hard when you drop it (which I have, without problems).

There are a few QC issues that I noticed, but certainly no deal breakers considering the affordable price. The only problem I’ve have is that the latch on the battery door of one of my receivers (but not the other) takes a good squeeze before it latches, but once it does latch it’s quite secure. I pointed it out in the picture below. Only a slight flaw, because the unit is fully functional, but I’m sure it wasn't designed to work this way.



The other issues I have are more along the lines of design shortfalls than actual defects. First, the trigger buttons on both the transmitter and receiver are very long, and they serve as the on switch for the receivers. What this means is that if you leave the batteries in the receiver, and throw it in your bag, 90% of the time the batteries will be dead when you get them out again. This is because the button is so easy to depress that the receiver essentially stays on in your bag (under normal use the receiver turns off after a certain amount of inactivity). There are some easy fixes to this, I took a nylon washer and Velcroed it over the button, so that it doesn’t depress itself. With the washer in place you can easily press the button with your fingernail, or remove the washer and have it function as normal. Or you can just take out the batteries when you are done with the receivers, not a big deal for some, but if you use them a lot it could grow to be a pain. Hopefully Mr. Buff will address this in the future with an on/off switch. FWIW the transmitter is “always on” and only draws power for each trigger.



My final beef, which is a minor one, is that the receivers aren't equipped with a good way to connect them to anything. I opted for velcro, which works fine. But most other recievers have a loop to connect a lanyard that you can use to hang the units from a light stand or the strobe itself. There is nothing included with the CyberSync receivers, unless you just hang the unit from the cable it connects with. This is a design oversight in my opinion, but not really a big deal in the grand scheme of things.

Usability: The units are very easy to set-up and use. The transmitter slides snugly into the hot shoe. There isn’t a lock on the shoe of the transmitter, and it is held on by friction alone. Whether or not this holds up in the long run who knows, but after about 5 months of use, I haven’t noticed the shoe wearing and don’t anticipate any problems.



The transmitter also has a PC port, and includes a short cable, if you want to trigger using a PC connection. This is handy if you use a light meter, or want to have a flash in your hotshoe and still trigger some slaves. For the observant ones out there I modeled this on my K10D which doesn't have a sync port, but I was shooting the pictures with my K20D, which does have the port..... So I've used this feature on the transmitters and it works just fine.




The channel selector is easy to use, just don’t cut your fingernails before a big shoot. It’s rudimentary but effective, simple and straightforward, so I have no complaints. It has 16 selectable channels.



The receivers have a single port and include a mini-plug to PC cable. They are very simple to set-up and use. Really nothing to screw up here. Pre-release cables are available (from flash zebra) to remotely fire a camera but I haven’t used them so can’t comment on that.


Reliability: I’ve been impressed with the functionality of these triggers under varying conditions. From shooting in the woods on a cold day, to indoor studio lighting stuff, they have never mis-fired. I’ve tested them shooting at 3 FPS (which is the limit of my K20D) and they kept up without a problem. If you are using them with a faster system, who knows, I can’t vouch for that.

I’ve never formally tested the usable distance claims, but I’ve haven’t had a problem with reliability at 150 feet and Alienbees claims usability up to 400 feet.

I use them with a pair of Nikon SB-28’s, and I’ve really enjoyed the system. If the flashes go to sleep, and quick tap of the fire button the transmitter wakes them up again.

Conclusion: I think Paul C Buff and Alienbees have a winner on their hands. The only flaws I could find were a slightly cheap build quality, but for the price it’s not even really a flaw. A balance has to be found between manufacturing costs, quality, and functionality. When it comes right down to it, the functionality, simplicity, and usability of these triggers certainly outweighs any compromises made to make the unit either smaller or less expensive to manufacture. Honestly, if these triggers fire every time (for me they have never failed) than I don’t care if they feel a little cheap. For the price of 2 basic PW’s ($380 for the pair- enough to trigger one strobe) you can fire off a 4 lights with the Cybersyncs (1 Transmitter and 4 recievers are $340 at time of writing) and have enough cash left over to take your model out for drinks.

Size (and conversely weight) is an important factor to me, and these are about as small and light as they come. Certainly an advantage (in my eyes) over the PW’s. The size of the receivers is less important to me, because I’m not carrying them around during a shoot, but the transmitters are small and light, which I certainly appreciate after a long day of shooting. Any compromise made in durability is certainly made up for in portability.

Overall I highly recommend these remotes. You could go with the cheaper (but notoriously less reliable) eBay cactus triggers, or step it up to the pocket wizards if you are a demanding user. In the end I think the CyberSyncs are going to fill the need for a lot of photographers, and provide a reliable, inexpensive alternative to start exploring the world of off camera lighting.


Warning: The preceding may not be appropriate for those offended by grammatical or spelling errors.



Last edited by bigben91682; 12-15-2008 at 02:50 PM.
12-15-2008, 02:49 PM   #2
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 728
Original Poster
Here are a couple of sample shots where I've used these triggers.....Doesn't really say much about the triggers except they have worked in a variety of different environments....



12-15-2008, 05:50 PM   #3
Veteran Member
LaRee's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,225
Thank you very much for the review of the CyberSync. I've been looking at these as well as the Flash Waves. It is good to get a user review on the CyberSync's. As far as the slotted channel changer, is the slot wide enough to fit a dime in to turn?
12-15-2008, 05:53 PM   #4
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 728
Original Poster
I'm sure a dime would work. You can actually turn it like a dial with your fingers, it isn't that difficult to turn, I just find it easier to use my fingernails, more accurate I suppose.

12-15-2008, 07:25 PM   #5
Veteran Member
soccerjoe5's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,343
Nice review. I was thinking of getting these. There are new Flashwaves (version 2) here already, at the equivalent of $145 USD (trigger + receiver). It has the antenna which added 20-30m to range. The antenna looks like the one on the Skyports.

If I were from the US though I'd probably get these or the upcoming Radiopoppers JRX ($49 a pop). The built-in hotshoe of the Flashwaves is hard to beat though, it's just so convenient and no need for adapters.
12-15-2008, 08:16 PM   #6
Veteran Member
maxwell1295's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,703
Thanks for the review. Now that I'm all lensed out, these are at the very top of my wishlist.
12-15-2008, 08:51 PM   #7
Veteran Member
LaRee's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,225
QuoteOriginally posted by soccerjoe5 Quote
Nice review. I was thinking of getting these. There are new Flashwaves (version 2) here already, at the equivalent of $145 USD (trigger + receiver). It has the antenna which added 20-30m to range. The antenna looks like the one on the Skyports.

If I were from the US though I'd probably get these or the upcoming Radiopoppers JRX ($49 a pop). The built-in hotshoe of the Flashwaves is hard to beat though, it's just so convenient and no need for adapters.
Not only do the Flashwaves have the built in hot shoe, they don't require the wires/leads which may be a bit cleaner in use? The company that makes the Radiopoppers seems to be just a tad flaky to me with their roll outs. At the moment the Flashwaves and the CyberSyncs seem to be the best show in town for me.

12-15-2008, 08:58 PM   #8
Veteran Member
krypticide's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,079
Thanks for the review. Too bad the Metz flashes don't have a PC sync port.
12-16-2008, 02:54 PM   #9
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 728
Original Poster
I know a lot of people are sold on the flashwaves, and from the sounds of it they are great triggers. I was actually torn between the FWs and CSs and I decided on the cybercyncs for a couple of reasons.

1. Using the Nikon speedlites I didn't need the hot-shoe connection, but I certainly see the appeal.
2. I've used alienbee strobes in the past and I loved the products and the company that stood behind them.
3. I wanted to purchase them domestically, While I've never heard of any problems from G9chon (or whatever) I usually try to deal as locally as possible in case I run into any warranty issues, it just simplifies everything.
4. I like to support small American companies whenever I can.
5. Paul C. Buff has an awesome haircut

The Flashwaves look sweet, but I have no regrets buying these Cybercyncs, they have served me well in my short time with them.
12-30-2008, 12:28 PM   #10
Veteran Member
maxwell1295's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,703
Thanks for the write-up. Between your CyberSync review and Peter Zack's FlashWave review I was torn, but ended up ordering the CS earlier today. It was a combination of things the led me to choose the CS over the FW:

1. Size - Based on photos I've seen, the CS seem be a smaller and less intrusive than anything on the market. The size of the FW receiver was a bit of a turnoff. Having never seen them in person, I could be wrong about this but it sure looks that way from the photos.

2. Paul C. Buff (the company) - I've heard nothing but good things about this company and from many different sources. Hard to argue with the rave reviews on both their products and their customer support.

3. Price - I was able to buy 1 transmitter/2 receivers and (2) Nikon SB-20's for less than I would've paid for same 1 transmitter/2 receiver setup from FW.

The lack of a hotshoe mount gave me some reason to rethink it, but I already had a few of those PC hotshoe adapters. I won't need them for the SB-20's since they have the built-in PC port.

Hopefully, they'll make it here by Friday so I can play around with them over the weekend.
12-30-2008, 03:00 PM   #11
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 728
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by maxwell1295 Quote
but ended up ordering the CS earlier today.
I'll have to submit a bill to Paul Buff for my commission....haha I wish!

Enjoy em! The Nikon Speedlites are very nice as well.
01-04-2009, 09:46 PM   #12
MSM
Veteran Member
MSM's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alabama
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 994
@Maxwell: We must be thinking alike. I also ordered a transmitter and a couple of receivers this past week. Mine came this past Friday. I love them. I like the smaller size and don't need the range of the PW's. I love the company and as mentioned I too try to support small US companies if possible.

I have been getting more into using off the camera flash ( read: Strobist). It has been fun (expensive) and certainly put my LBA on hold .
01-04-2009, 10:18 PM   #13
Veteran Member
maxwell1295's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,703
QuoteOriginally posted by MSM Quote
@Maxwell: We must be thinking alike. I also ordered a transmitter and a couple of receivers this past week. Mine came this past Friday. I love them. I like the smaller size and don't need the range of the PW's. I love the company and as mentioned I too try to support small US companies if possible.

I have been getting more into using off the camera flash ( read: Strobist). It has been fun (expensive) and certainly put my LBA on hold .
I ordered them Tuesday afternoon, they were shipped on Wednesday, and they arrived here on Friday. I haven't had a chance to do anything other than test them for functionality. I also did a distance test by walking down the street and having my wife trigger the flash by pressing the test button on the transmitter. I didn't measure, but I'd say it was good for about 80-100yds. I'll do a football field test sometime next week.
01-11-2009, 11:18 AM   #14
Veteran Member
maxwell1295's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,703
As promised..... the football fied range test.

I found the Cybersyncs to operate flawlessly until I got to 80 yards, where it fired only 1 out of 4 times (25%). It was perfect at 90 yards and fired 3 of 4 times at 100 yards (75%). It was 2 for 4 (50%) at 110 yards. Chances are I will never use these past 20-30 yards and even that may be stretching it. Still, it's good to know that they have more range than I'll ever need. I haven't experienced any misfires at "normal" distances.

10 yards


20 yards


30 yards


40 yards


50 yards


60 yards


70 yards


80 yards


90 yards


100 yards


110 yards

01-11-2009, 11:28 AM   #15
Veteran Member
LaRee's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,225
Alan, thank you for the testing and posting the results. How nice that you had access to a football field to have the measurements.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
button, cable, day, light, pc, receiver, receivers, size, transmitter, trigger, tripod
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For those that are considering radio flash triggers. FlashWaves Peter Zack Flashes, Lighting, and Studio 144 12-26-2010 01:47 AM
Can't get to 1/180th sync speed using Cybersync Triggers on a K-x noahpurdy Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 8 03-18-2010 06:38 AM
K7 Shutter Speed on Radio Triggers Gigahz Pentax DSLR Discussion 13 03-08-2010 05:42 AM
Radio Triggers MJB DIGITAL Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 22 02-23-2010 02:02 PM
540 and radio triggers davemdsn Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 1 08-06-2008 05:41 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:47 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top