Originally posted by Lowell Goudge
It is not as much about holding the lens steady, but simply just holding it.
while they might give an extra stop for hand holding, they do take up all of the weight holding.
Originally posted by Marc Langille
Normally I use it the most when I wish to be mobile with the FA* 300/2.8, but that's not normally "lighter gear"...
Seriously, it's just used to hold up the lens - I'm using both hands (and my face) to dampening everything when shooting. The image clarity using this technique even at very low shutter speeds has proven to be incredibly good/successful.
Hi Jason,
It took a while, but I agree with the points made by LG and ML here.
I'm a birder, but I like to roam around and shoot as opportunities present themselves as opposed to setting up a blind and primarily waiting for my subjects to show up. I regularly use a 300/2.8 with or without TCs, and though I find this setup handholdable, it's just barely so, and only for short periods of time. I found that a monopod helps here, allowing me to hold the cam/lens combo to eyelevel for long lengths of time while I scan around for likely subjects.
If used with good tecnique, it can help a lot when shooting in relatively low light, allowing lower ISO and shutter speeds than handholding, but primarily I have to say that I use mine to support the camera's weight and prevent fatigue more than to steady the camera.
Scott