Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-01-2009, 04:09 PM   #1
Veteran Member
causey's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,757
What UV filter would you recommend?

I need two--67mm and 62mm--and I'm hesitating between Hoya Pro1 DMC and B+W MRC UV 010 F-Pro. I heard Hoya were difficult to clean and had fragile coatings.

09-01-2009, 04:57 PM   #2
Veteran Member
wlachan's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,625
All HOYA MCs are difficult to clean, except the HD which is said to be more smear resistance than B+W MRC. I just bought the HOYA HD CPL 77mm and the coating is indeed easy to clean. Their DMC (97%, same as HMC) is inferior to HMC SUPER (99.7%) btw. I am not sure how flare resistance the HD coating is.

NEW HOYA 67mm HD High Definition Digital UV Filter | MaxSaver.Net (hvStar)
NEW HOYA 62mm HD High Definition Digital UV Filter | MaxSaver.Net (hvStar)
09-01-2009, 06:27 PM   #3
Veteran Member
alohadave's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quincy, MA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,024
None. There is no photographic need for a UV filter unless you are up in the mountains or shooting at high elevations from a plane.

The original purpose of a UV filter was to prevent UV from getting to the film and causing a color cast. Most people use them for protection now.
09-01-2009, 08:07 PM   #4
Veteran Member
causey's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,757
Original Poster
I just came back from a two week trip to Italy. Most of the time the filter--a cheap one--was full with dust, and on several occasions it got water splashed. I was glad to have it on, because it avoided my repeatedly cleaning the lens itself.

QuoteOriginally posted by alohadave Quote
None. There is no photographic need for a UV filter unless you are up in the mountains or shooting at high elevations from a plane.

The original purpose of a UV filter was to prevent UV from getting to the film and causing a color cast. Most people use them for protection now.


09-01-2009, 08:40 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Ratmagiclady's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: GA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,563
QuoteOriginally posted by causey Quote
I just came back from a two week trip to Italy. Most of the time the filter--a cheap one--was full with dust, and on several occasions it got water splashed. I was glad to have it on, because it avoided my repeatedly cleaning the lens itself.
Really depends what lens you want it for and what purpose. Generally apart from 'beaters' (which I put on in crappy conditions to save cleaning) I'll only put them on my most vulnerable lenses (namely, those that can't take a deep hood and have pretty exposed/big elements) and then only the best I can manage to obtain.


If for some reason your filter's getting that cruddy, you'd probably best look at why that is, and if you can't stop that from happening, carry a couple of reasonable quality filters to juggle, rather than buy any one extra-nice thing: nothing's gonna stand up to that kind of thing for very long or stay as nice as you paid for under such treatment, anyway.

(Edit: BTW, I usually operate under pretty tame conditions. If things are really getting full of dust or flying water, due diligence may prove convenient. To my experience, salt spray and blowing sand and the like usually mean I don't want to risk spending my nicest *polarizer,* but that's often exactly when I want *a* polarizer on there. Cheap ones of those are often worth having around for just that reason. )

Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 09-01-2009 at 08:54 PM.
09-02-2009, 06:15 AM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,553
I've just started buying Kenko ProD filters. These are the only wide filters I know of that have a front filter threads. I can use them on the Sigma 10-20mm without issue.

Thank you
Russell
09-02-2009, 06:49 AM   #7
Ash
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,920
Go with B+W's MRC range - they're top quality and minimally affect IQ.
Otherwise, you can go with Hoya's Super HMC or even plain HMC variety - each have shown to be equally good at limiting IQ effects.

09-04-2009, 04:54 AM   #8
Veteran Member
causey's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,757
Original Poster
Thank you all for your pieces of advice. I think I'll follow Ash's.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
hoya, tripod, uv, uv filter

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What would you recommend fekish Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 18 09-10-2010 09:25 AM
For Sale - Sold: Pentax and Albinar 2x TCs, 2 Cokin A filter sets, 49mm Filter and Macro tubes pxpaulx Sold Items 15 02-11-2010 09:09 PM
Recommend a polarizer filter for K10D Green_Manelishi Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 18 06-04-2009 09:59 AM
I don't recommend doing this! xs400 Post Your Photos! 17 07-20-2008 03:48 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:51 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top