Copy/pasting my review from Amazon last year:
Lowepro Photo Sport 200 AW
I bought this pack because, for most dayhikes, I don't need a huge 30L pack like my Dakine Blade ski pack. Instead, I wanted something smaller, lighter yet still versatile.
In the past I've used primarily a Lowerpro Rover AW II and Dakine Blade ski pack + MountainSmith insert. They're both good packs. The Rover is similar in concept to the Photo Sport, but it's old, huge, lacks any rigidity, rather uncomfortable and bottom access sucks. The Dakine is great and scads more versatile being a regular pack. It's still my go to pack for longer weekends when I need more gear. Wish it had a rigid frame/structure though, and I'm not as big a fan of using inserts since mixed gear may shift in movement, even when tightened in with compression straps.
Positives:
* The Photo Sport 200 AW is smaller, lighter, generally more comfortable and "smarter". When I'm hiking, I'm not hauling all my gear. A small prime, zoom, tripod, flash (sometimes).
* I love the rigid back to the pack, which helps to properly support whatever weight you've loaded up.
* The dedicated side access pocket is convenient and big enough for my gear (Pentax K7, 35mm prime, 18-135 WR, Metz 50 AF-1 Flash).
* The hydration pocket can double as a tablet pocket for travel.
* There's enough space between the main compartment and rear external pocket for a jacket, snacks, wallet, keys, phone, tools, and other malarky like sunscreen. There are also a number of attachment points for...whatever you might need to attach.
* The all-weather rain hood works well. I've used it multiple times now in utter downpours. My gear stayed dry.
* Relatively "generic backpack" appearance, which doesn't scream "camera gear inside!"
* This pack is definitely well built. For the hell of it, I WAY overloaded it for a camping weekend. It managed to do surprisingly well. Between the pockets, compartments and attachments, I loaded it up with hydration, clothes, food, tent, pad, sleeping bag, towel, tools, etc, etc... See linked picture at the bottom. Now, I wouldn't do this normally. I imagine the stress and weight would eventually spell the demise of the pack, especially at the attachment/stress points. Instead I'd probably strap it to an external frame, or choose a larger pack for the purpose. Regardless, I was happily surprised.
Negatives:
* The shoulder straps could have been a smidge wider or more padded
* Same with the waist straps and pads
Conclusion:
It's still not the "perfect" pack for everything. No such thing exists. It's a great daypack and I have no regrets.
http://i.imgur.com/cH0gkui.jpg
update:
Got the k-3 with free grip and lens from B&H. I have been able to stow the K-3 + battery grip, and the lens. It's a bit of a tight squeeze, but it works and all is secure.
So inside the padded camera compartment:
- K-3 + grip + 18-135WR
- DA 35mm 2.4
- DA 50mm 1.8
- Metz 50 AF-1 Flash
Then I have the DA 55-300 WR HD in it's padded case inside the main compartment.
When I use the Capture Clip with the grip on the k-3, I need to also use Peak Design's PROpad and move the sternum strap to just higher than the clip to aid with stabilization.
Besides, when doing any serious hiking, I'd probably leave the grip, flash and primes at home.