Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.
Originally posted by Abbazz 135mm is usually too short for birds in the wild, except they are entangled in a net -- and probably dead.
In terms of the general comment, I would agree, 135 is usually too short, but I disagree that the only time it is possible is if the bird is dead, please see the attached, shot with a 28-105
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/182066-post33.html
or the warbler below
Quote: 200-300mm would be the minimum for birds accustomed to man or when shooting behind a blind, and 500-600mm when stalking up on wild birds.
Cheers!
Abbazz
while I agree that there is an advantage to having a long lens, any lens can work. Both these were in the wild. Clearly the hawk had something more interesting to think about than me, but the warbler was just sitting there as I walked past on a trail in the woods.
I have also many shots, especially bigger birds at 300 mm.
While I don't disagree that longer is easier to get photos, length is really more a question of ease vs patience. Yes a blind can help, but I don't use one.
Last edited by Lowell Goudge; 03-28-2011 at 11:30 AM.