Originally posted by jcdoss I think the growing trend is that dogs are being allowed in public places, stores, and restuarants with growing frequency in some urban areas. The fear of zoonotic disease remains high in the minds of public officials, but they often forget that small children are far worse carriers of infectious disease, yet it's illegal to exclude them. The list of things you can catch from a dog in the grocery store is minimal if the animal is up to date on routine veterinary care.
In connection with that, the nearby major water source for Boston (Quabbin Reservoir) has an extensive wild area all around it, some nice trails, but from the outset all domestic animals were strictly forbidden so we cannot take Tralee there for a walk even on leash (basic fine = $800). But I've wondered, what about that surrounding wilderness area with myriads of raccoons, squirrels, fox, coyote, rabbits birds that fly over the water, birds that swim upon the water, fish, turtles, and frogs that are in the water*. Why is the poop of a dog walking on a trail for a few hours so horrendously worse that the poop deposited on the same trails and directly into the water by the vastly larger numbers of wildlife including at least three species of canine all of which are doing it 24/7? Present that logic to anyone who might think about the law = might was well talk to the asphalt in my driveway.