Congrats to whoever supporting the winners. (I'm not much familiar with it)
And about the Raynox:
I'm feeling a little bit guilty! because those photos wasn't the whole picture, and I left it to talk about it in my review of the month, but since Sandy, Simon and Rod are ordering it, I should explain that a dedicated macro is still a much much better and easier solution for macros. but for someone who is on budget, I think the Raynox is really a great way to get into macro works.
But the bad thing about Raynox?
If you use it on a prime lens the working distance and magnification ratio is very limited, resulting in many shots which I missed because I couldn't fit the whole thing (such as Dragonflies, flowers, ...) in my frame!
And I think most zooms won't work as good in so much close focusing situation, except those fancy expensive ones such as DA50-135 but because most of them are IF still you can't use Raynox on them.
But the good part is that when you already have a dedicated macro and it's DFA100WR (No aperture ring), putting a Raynox on it will help you have more magnification and the macro lens will work perfect with it. And it's still a handy little thing to keep in pocket when you have a normal lens as your single in lens but you love macro like me.
And I'm gonna use it next month on DA50 too.
So, I think it's still a good investment. LOL.