Congratulations! All ten of you made it into the TOP TEN!
So this is the part I wasn't looking forward to... Now I have to chose my favorite.
I enjoyed seeing you guys take my image and put your own spin on it. I chose this image, because night sky shots present a big challenge for processing with a large latitude for artistic interpretation, as we see in your versions. I would bet most of us have little chance to get these clear night skies from such a dark location, and therefore have little experience processing Milky Way shots. I have been following Michael Shainblum's work. His night sky images and processing tutorial have been inspirational for me. You can check out his site as well as the free video tutorials there to see what has influenced my personal tastes.
Since most of us are probably doing a Post-processing Challenge to sharpen our PP skills, I decided to comment on each photo, in the order they were posted. I commented on what I liked about each, as well as what I didn't care for so much. Please keep in mind that my comments are based only on my personal tastes and are meant to be constructive.
Glenn5995 mentioned Star Wars, which is one of the many movies shot at the Trona Pinnacles. I hoped a talented Photoshopper would pick up on this and include some fantastic Star Wars imagery.
Thanks for participating in this round!
slipdm16, I liked the color and exposure level you chose. The foreground is nice and dark, yet retains some nice detail. You corrected the CA well. I like that you made local adjustments to the Milky Way, but I wish the local adjustment brush was feathered more or was less noticeable, especially near the top.
K David, I love the detail and natural color of the foreground, as well as the color of the sky. You showed some skill adding the star trails, but you replaced 80% of my photo! Good thing I love star trails. I assume you shot the stars yourself. Of course, the original shot was facing south and your star trails are rotating around Polaris.
schnitzer79, I would have no idea how to accomplish what you did here. I like how you tried to conceal the mirror by changing the shapes of the rock outlines. Perhaps, rearranging some rocks in the foreground would have helped with the illusion. The mirrored sky is strange to me, and the center appears very purplish, even in the foreground. Nice detail everywhere.
todd, You managed to pull tons of detail from the foreground, but this seems to at the expense of extra noise.. The colors are unnatural to my taste. (I loved your mirrored entry in the last round.)
gor80, I like the exposure level and colors, with the exception of the added pink hues. Maybe too much sharpening.
D1N0, The Milky Way in the Milky Way is certainly worth a laugh. I would have no idea how to do this sort of Photoshop thing, but this one appears well-executed. The way you processed the stars here was my favorite. The foreground was also well done. I wish you had corrected the CA fringing that is visible in the stars and especially the top right edge of the horizon.
Glenn5995, You managed to show great detail in the Milky Way without a bunch of added noise. You also kept the tones very even, which worked to keep the sky from getting too bright at the horizon. However; the even tones made the sky and foreground appear a little flat. I've seen you process your own Milky Way shots very much to my liking, but this one has really got the blues. I've been searching all week! Would someone tell me where to find those two characters?
LarsW, Thanks for sticking me with this task. Nice foreground and detail throughout. You corrected all of the CAs. I wish the sky didn't get so light at the bottom.
discharged, Overall I really liked your version. I love how the sky fades to black at the top and the detail in the Milky Way. At this size, its hard to tell, but I wish you had corrected the CA. Your crop makes sense.
astonm, I liked the color balance you chose and the excellent detail in the Milky Way. On my monitors, the lower half seems a little bright. I don't understand your crop as you chose eliminate a good portion of the foreground and a section of the well-defined southern section of the Milky Way, which is really the subject of the image. Good job otherwise.
3rd Place: K David - Congratulations... but you win nothing.
2nd Place: D1N0 - Congratulations... You almost had to judge the next round!
1st Place: discharged - Yay!!! You win the honor of hosting the next round and the unenviable task of judging your peers.
Great job!
Originally posted by discharged Here is my entry. I wanted to bring this closer to what you might have actually seen,
Lightroom:
1. I lowered the color temperature to about 3k
2. I added some contrast.
3. bumped up the clarity
4. I tried to remove as much of the light pollution as possible because after these steps it was no longer looking natural.
5. At this point I was satisfied with the sky, but all detail in the stone was lost.
6. exported this to photoshop
---
7. remade the enitre image to give a true representation of the stone and what might have been seen by the naked eye by:
8. lowered the color temperature to about 3k
9. got a bit more highlighting in the picture and deepened the shadows.
10. desaturated it alot
11. exported to photoshop
----
12. added the new picture as a layer on the first one.
13. got to work with the erasor on the sky and removed all of it from the second layer
14. done.
Attachment 244295