Originally posted by aslyfox During a visit to the restaurant in Death Valley we had rattle snake fritter appetizer. They were delicious.
And as with other words that have sometimes engendered commentary if not debate, common usage may be running ahead of technical rules. Here's a quote from Motivated Grammar:
"Poisonous and
venomous aren’t totally distinct. It’s fine to call a snake
poisonous, even if it’s its venom that’s dangerous. But it’s rare (and generally incorrect) to call something with a non-venom poison
venomous. This is how it has been for hundreds of years in English. Objections to the subset relationship between
poisonous and
venomous are pretty rare, and outside of specialized contexts, pretty unfounded."
Because of some grammatical correctness I learned, I wince slightly at the combination "pretty unfounded." There's nothing pretty about being unfounded. "More or less unfounded" is what I would write.