Panorama-orama - Post your Panos

todd · 11-14-2012, 03:07 PM

wow that rockefeller shot!

pentaxian_tmb · 11-14-2012, 03:15 PM

**wtlwdwgn** · 11-14-2012, 03:41 PM

I'll give this a try.

Swan Lake Flats, Yellowstone NP.

Flooded Yellowstone River.

South Twin Lake, Yellowstone NP.

**mikeSF** · 11-14-2012, 03:47 PM

love that last one, Steve!

renegadesv · 11-14-2012, 04:32 PM

7 shot panoramic from the top of Cloud's Rest in Yosemite.

twitch · 11-14-2012, 04:47 PM

Originally posted by crewl1

Great shots Twitch!

Originally posted by mattb123

Really nice work Twitch!

Thanks!

**wtlwdwgn** · 11-14-2012, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by mikeSF

love that last one, Steve!

Thanks Mike!

christophleipzig · 11-17-2012, 05:20 AM

Sorry, kind of big.

Its Finnish part of Lappland.

**mikeSF** · 11-17-2012, 09:23 AM

i am somewhat bothered that you posted this so large because i cannot see more than a fraction of the image at a time on my computer, but it also revealed the fact that your individual frames have different points of focus (were you using AF by mistake?). That is, in some areas, the foreground is sharp and the background soft and then in other parts the foreground is soft and parts of the mid and background are sharp. This is challenging to view, quite honestly.

Sage97 · 11-17-2012, 09:56 AM

I just succeeded in doing a basic panoramic shot thanks to all the posts here. The resulting pic isn't anything worth sharing but I'm just excited that it worked. So much learning to do. Thanks all.

manacho2005 · 11-17-2012, 10:23 AM

Taken at Joe Pool Lake, Cedar Hill, TX off a kayak(very cautiously) with a 18-135.

Daingerfield State Park with 18-135(it was raining).

Pecan Hill, TX with a Sigma 170-500.

christophleipzig · 11-17-2012, 11:58 AM

Originally posted by mikeSF

i am somewhat bothered that you posted this so large because i cannot see more than a fraction of the image at a time on my computer, but it also revealed the fact that your individual frames have different points of focus (were you using AF by mistake?). That is, in some areas, the foreground is sharp and the background soft and then in other parts the foreground is soft and parts of the mid and background are sharp. This is challenging to view, quite honestly.

I actually see the picture as it is down there in the screenshot. I think, it is easily a question of the browser.

The panorama was shot with manual focus, the single pictures are sharp from the beginning to the end. But I think in post production some parts were a bit over-processed. When I have time, I could do another version of this. I would definitely do that, if I would get it printed. But on a monitor I just think this is a super minor problem.

Well, nice, that you have taken the challenge to watch the picture though.

**mikeSF** · 11-17-2012, 01:42 PM

well, here's how your pic looks on my screen. As yours is the ONLY pic i've ever seen that large, I see no point in trying to change any of my settings. I still recommend you re-size your image as a courtesy to others.

christophleipzig · 11-17-2012, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by mikeSF

I still recommend you re-size your image as a courtesy to others.

I am just too lazy, you know...

Lovely crop by the way. Variations in grey. Could be posted in the texture and pattern-thread.

**mikeSF** · 11-17-2012, 02:07 PM

Originally posted by christophleipzig

I am just too lazy, you know...

Lovely crop by the way. Variations in grey. Could be posted in the texture and pattern-thread.

or in the blurry photos thread.

11-14-2012, 04:32 PM	#155
renegadesv Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Sacramento, CA Posts: 34	7 shot panoramic from the top of Cloud's Rest in Yosemite. Attached Images

11-17-2012, 11:58 AM	#162
christophleipzig Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Oulu, Finland Posts: 318	Originally posted by mikeSF i am somewhat bothered that you posted this so large because i cannot see more than a fraction of the image at a time on my computer, but it also revealed the fact that your individual frames have different points of focus (were you using AF by mistake?). That is, in some areas, the foreground is sharp and the background soft and then in other parts the foreground is soft and parts of the mid and background are sharp. This is challenging to view, quite honestly. I actually see the picture as it is down there in the screenshot. I think, it is easily a question of the browser. The panorama was shot with manual focus, the single pictures are sharp from the beginning to the end. But I think in post production some parts were a bit over-processed. When I have time, I could do another version of this. I would definitely do that, if I would get it printed. But on a monitor I just think this is a super minor problem. Well, nice, that you have taken the challenge to watch the picture though. Attached Images

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version E-mail to a Friend	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
my first panos from US trip	Patriot	Post Your Photos!	10	10-09-2008 10:35 AM
2 panos from Baltimore, MD	12345Michael54321	Post Your Photos!	17	09-08-2008 06:30 PM
Mountain Panos	mtnbearhug	Post Your Photos!	22	07-20-2008 11:14 AM
Exposure for Panos	Buddha Jones	Photographic Technique	25	04-09-2008 04:24 PM
A few panos from my trip! (wide post)	mikerigel	Post Your Photos!	10	06-28-2007 02:47 PM

11-14-2012, 03:07 PM	#151
todd Pentaxian Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Basement Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,197	wow that rockefeller shot!

11-14-2012, 03:15 PM	#152
pentaxian_tmb Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Madison, Wisconsin Posts: 293

11-14-2012, 03:41 PM	#153
wtlwdwgn Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Billings, MT Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 11,088	I'll give this a try. Swan Lake Flats, Yellowstone NP. Flooded Yellowstone River. South Twin Lake, Yellowstone NP.

11-14-2012, 03:47 PM	#154
mikeSF Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: East Bay Area, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,047	love that last one, Steve!

11-14-2012, 04:47 PM	#156
twitch Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 4,571	Originally posted by crewl1 Great shots Twitch! Originally posted by mattb123 Really nice work Twitch! Thanks!

11-14-2012, 04:55 PM	#157
wtlwdwgn Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Billings, MT Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 11,088	Originally posted by mikeSF love that last one, Steve! Thanks Mike!

11-17-2012, 05:20 AM	#158
christophleipzig Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Oulu, Finland Posts: 318	Sorry, kind of big. Its Finnish part of Lappland.

11-17-2012, 09:23 AM	#159
mikeSF Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: East Bay Area, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,047	i am somewhat bothered that you posted this so large because i cannot see more than a fraction of the image at a time on my computer, but it also revealed the fact that your individual frames have different points of focus (were you using AF by mistake?). That is, in some areas, the foreground is sharp and the background soft and then in other parts the foreground is soft and parts of the mid and background are sharp. This is challenging to view, quite honestly.

11-17-2012, 09:56 AM	#160
Sage97 Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Photos: Albums Posts: 2,808	I just succeeded in doing a basic panoramic shot thanks to all the posts here. The resulting pic isn't anything worth sharing but I'm just excited that it worked. So much learning to do. Thanks all.

11-17-2012, 10:23 AM	#161
manacho2005 Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Red Oak, TX Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 462	Taken at Joe Pool Lake, Cedar Hill, TX off a kayak(very cautiously) with a 18-135. Daingerfield State Park with 18-135(it was raining). Pecan Hill, TX with a Sigma 170-500.

11-17-2012, 01:42 PM	#163
mikeSF Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: East Bay Area, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,047	well, here's how your pic looks on my screen. As yours is the ONLY pic i've ever seen that large, I see no point in trying to change any of my settings. I still recommend you re-size your image as a courtesy to others.

11-17-2012, 02:00 PM	#164
christophleipzig Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Oulu, Finland Posts: 318	Originally posted by mikeSF I still recommend you re-size your image as a courtesy to others. I am just too lazy, you know... Lovely crop by the way. Variations in grey. Could be posted in the texture and pattern-thread.

11-17-2012, 02:07 PM	#165
mikeSF Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: East Bay Area, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,047	Originally posted by christophleipzig I am just too lazy, you know... Lovely crop by the way. Variations in grey. Could be posted in the texture and pattern-thread. or in the blurry photos thread.