Originally posted by monochrome Caused by EPA mandates. The auto company has to meet a real-world mileage and emission mandate, knowing the imprecision of humans. They can design a computer controlled engine and automatic transmission that will meet the EPA test protocol, but can’t meet the test protocol for manual trans. The manual trans protocol has a (negative) mileage and emission penalty for human driving characteristics. Or so EPA thinks. They believe manual transmissions encourage racy driving and unnecessary downshifting.
Every dummy device on a modern car is mandated by the (EPA or NTSB) Nanny State.
Mmm no, in standard WLTP or the old NEDC cycles manual transmissions perform better than auto, for the simple reason the efficiency of a manual transmission is about 95% while an auto if gets 60% is very well designed. Also, without auto transmission a car is much simpler and lighter, therefore the fuel economy and emissions are better.
Most conventional cars in Europe still have manual gearboxes, the problem is that you can't make a manual hybrid therefore as that is the direction of the market manual transmissions are doomed. Again, not a problem of cycles or anything like that.
However, this is the LR Wolf proto as requested in another thread.