Originally posted by PePe The choice of lenses depends on how close to the animals you get. In Kruger and some of the other South African parks you often get very close to them, and a 70-200mm will be sufficient. In the "real" wilderness you need more reach. This is where I use 300mm and 500mm primes.
Welcome to the forum!
I agree with PePe - 200mm may be enough but it depends how close you will get. On safari in Tanzania 300mm was usually enough but I was still reaching for the 1.4x teleconverter at times.
I cannot fault the image quality of the Sigma 100-300 f4 but it is fairly hefty if you are travelling.
If your 50-200 is a good copy then maybe using that in combination with a longer prime would work. However, bear in mind that you don't want to be changing lenses too frequently in dusty conditions. That is why a lot of people suggest the Sigma 50-500.