Originally posted by ElJamoquio It's easy to go overboard.
If you're trying to do everything. .. you can not do it with one lens.
For landscapes many people like wider lenses. For sports most people like long/fast lenses... which is an expensive combination.
On the less expensive side, the 18-55 is a less expensive place to start. Perhaps the 17-70 isn't too much more expensive.
For longer lenses... the 55-300 is a good place to start.
Welcome!
Thanks a lot! I will look into these options Preferably new ones, but If they are very expensive I am open for used ones. Do you know any reliable source for used lenses? I don't want to get ripped off. Thanks again.
---------- Post added 05-11-14 at 11:12 PM ----------
Originally posted by ElJamoquio It's easy to go overboard.
If you're trying to do everything. .. you can not do it with one lens.
For landscapes many people like wider lenses. For sports most people like long/fast lenses... which is an expensive combination.
On the less expensive side, the 18-55 is a less expensive place to start. Perhaps the 17-70 isn't too much more expensive.
For longer lenses... the 55-300 is a good place to start.
Welcome!
Awesome! Thanks for your feedback.
---------- Post added 05-11-14 at 11:17 PM ----------
Originally posted by Jean Poitiers Bonjour from France and welcome to PF, W.Scott ... The DA 35/2.4 is a great lens for the value and I would suggest that you get a "WR" zoom lens so that you can go everywhere with your K-5IIs. Hope to see some images soon ... Salut, J
Makes perfect sense to get a WR lens. I will post some images soon!
---------- Post added 05-11-14 at 11:19 PM ----------
Originally posted by clackers Hello, WS, well done on your choice - it's a pretty classy P&S you now have! :-)
You can use it similarly in Auto or the various scene modes.
When you feel comfortable you can go into P mode (which doesn't get much love from veterans) and adjust variables for effect.
Depending on how far you want to go with the hobby it can lead all the way to full manual control.
I started with Auto and cannot wait to get into full manual. But as everybody knows, you have to learn to crawl before walking and running afterwards!
---------- Post added 05-11-14 at 11:20 PM ----------
Originally posted by Na Horuk Hey, welcome! Right now you have a good quality kit, but its not the easiest to use! The K-5 is an advanced camera, so the learning curve is quite steep. Hang in there!
What I would suggest regarding lenses is to think about a WR lens, because in bad weather, both the camera and lens need to be WR (otherwise water can trickle in at the mount or through the lens, yikes). So something like the DA 18-55mm WR or DA 18-135mm WR. These lenses don't have image quality and low light performance on the same level as the DA 35mm, but they offer a convenient zoom range and WR.
Excellent! I will look into those. Any suggestions to where to find used ones?
---------- Post added 05-11-14 at 11:22 PM ----------
Originally posted by DSims That was a good choice. It gives good Image Quality and can be shot wide open (while retaining good quality) if desired. But of course it won't cover wider or longer needs.
If you can, pick up a used F or FA135/2.8 plus an FA*24/2, A24/2.8, or DA15/4. This will give you a taste of the different focal lengths, and the F/FA135 is fast focusing for sports. Plus they're all high quality lenses (with high IQ). Also get a Cosina 100/3.5 or similar lens for macros - it's affordable and still good IQ, like the DA35/2.4 you bought. It's not really a great substitute for the FA135, however, so get both if possible.
Thanks for the orientation. I will look into these lenses. A friend suggested looking for them at eBay. Do you have any other suggestions?