Originally posted by d0riath .... I've enjoyed using fast lenses the most, as I tend to end up wanting to shoot in lower light. My favorite lens that my brother-in-law has is the Canon EF 50mm f1.8 on his T1i (an almost ancient body!). I do also have an interest in shooting photos of my soccer team during games, but that is almost always in bright sunlight (being in Los Angeles).
Final question: Is the K30 (body only) at under $300 a better deal than $600 for the K50 with the two kit lenses? What about $600 for the K5-IIs (body only) with the battery grip and memory card? I'm thinking the K30 gets me the most for my money and lets me choose my lenses better, but I wanted to get some opinions.
Evening Will and Welcome to the Forum!
Several items here. You say you like to shoot in low light - but what type of shooting? People, street scenes, astrophotography, cityscapes, night clubs, etc? That would help on the type of lens. Also, you really do not need a fast lens to shoot cityscapes, or some street scenes, etc. You need a fast lens in order to freeze motion - no (or little) motion, then you can go with a slower lens.
For sunny soccer, just about any moderate long lens will do pretty well there. Like the 55-300. Really depends on how close to the action you are usually are.
Right now the K30 at $300 would be a really good buy. Bodies depreciate fairly rapidly - money into lenses has a much longer longevity.
I see that Crew has PM you - listen to his advice, he will not steer you wrong..... I just read Tom's post - his approach and suggestions also have a lot of merit. Depends on your checkbook and what your intentions are....