Originally posted by maweber Welcome aboard, I am recently new here myself and picked up a K-3II, but instead of the 16-85 wen the 20-40 LTD route.
I looked at the 20-40 and it does look like a very good lens. For my use though I am still leaning towards the 16-85 which I had with my previous. The IQ is well above average for zooms in its range, and I really liked the results I go. Then too, I want and need a wider angle and a little more telephoto for my type of shooting. I can see though why the 20-40 would serve you well. My goal is a small versatile kit. I like to travel light.
Worst part for me know is seeing some early results from the K1, it is sooo tempting. Yes larger and heavier but the increased detail is amazing. I do a lot of landscapes, seascapes, etc and also like photographing unusual or historical architecture. I have time though to consider my options so end of May is the earliest I might be able to buy. Will wait to see some results of the new Pentax FF lenses and research FF third party lenses. For landscape work, the K1 would be a dream.
Decisions, decisions.....