Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-17-2016, 10:49 AM   #1
New Member




Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Travel Kit opinion

Greetings from Canada,

Long time lurker and decided to finally join.
We are currently planning a trip to iceland and trying to get our camera equipment sorted, without getting overwhelmed.
Long time pentax user. MX,ME,ME SUPER, K100D, K5. Currently saving my pennies for the K1. We shoot wide variety of subjects, and enjoy birding. We are trying to figure out if we need/want a different lens for our trip or should we use what we have. What would your ideal lens combo be?

At my current disposal.
50mm M f1.7
50mm A f1.7
50mm F f1.7
50mm A f2.8 macro
40mm DA f2.8 XS
35-105 A f3.5
28-80mm FA f3.5-4.7
10-17mm DA f3.5-4.5 fish eye
28-90mm FA f3.5-5.6
90mm Sigma F2.8 macro
18-55mm F3.5 WR
100-300mm FA f4.7-5.8
80-320mm FA f4.5-f5.6
18-250mm Sigma f3.5-6.3 macro hsm
150-500mm Sigma f5-6.3

My current thoughts are.
18-250 sigma, 50mm F, 50mm A macro as backup, fish eye, 90mm macro, 150-500 sigma, 40mm XS.18-55 WR

If feels like a lot. I do know, less is more, but we are going along way and will not be going back. So I figure this covers landscapes , if we stitch the 50mm shots. Macro for up close stuff, fish eye for fun, 150-500 for birds, 18-250 for walking around lens, 40mm for Pocket, WR for the rain.......also, gorilla pod, and a tripod.


I have been eyeing the 1.7x adapter for a teleconverter, and the 50mm FA, and the 77mm FA limited. But I haven't picked them up because I think the K1 is probably a better investment.

I would appreciate some input from the forum.

Also, just to note. In the past we have never brought more than 2 or 3 lenses and got on just fine. So...... what would your combo be and why? Also if there is a lens you think would be IDEAL, I'd like to hear why?

Cheers,

Armi101

12-17-2016, 10:57 AM   #2
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
MarkJerling's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wairarapa, New Zealand
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 20,403
Welcome to the forum. I think your selection would work well. Would it be necessary to take both 50mm's? Having said that, I probably would.
12-17-2016, 11:12 AM   #3
Senior Member
xabolcs's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wild-Nord-East Hungary
Photos: Albums
Posts: 149
Greeting!
If I'm traveling, I take the following (and I no carried a long telephoto lens)
DA 10-17mm
50mm F 1.7
90mm F2.8
12-17-2016, 11:16 AM   #4
PEG Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland... "Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand" - William Blake
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 57,815
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
currently planning a trip to Iceland
Welcome to the forum.

To say I'm somewhat jealous would be a massive understatement.

My lens choice would be perhaps different to most folk, it is as follows... 50mm A f1.7, 50mm A f2.8 macro, 35-105 A f3.5, 150-500mm Sigma f5-6.3.

By way of an explanation for my choices, keeping overall kit as light as possible, then in order, something for low light, a great wee macro, a walk around "stack of primes" and something for your birds.

Also posting your query here, may get you more of a response. Pentax DSLR Discussion - PentaxForums.com


Last edited by Kerrowdown; 12-17-2016 at 11:49 AM.
12-17-2016, 11:25 AM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
microlight's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,129
Welcome! My kit for travelling is the one you see in my signature!
12-17-2016, 11:26 AM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
pres589's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Wichita, KS
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,529
Is this for your k5 or a future k1? Out of your current lens list, I might go with the 10-17, F 50 1.7, and I guess that 18-55 WR. Wide, walking zoom, and low light / portrait lens group. I could see selling a bunch of those lenses and getting the new 28-105 or a similar 3rd party full frame lens.
12-17-2016, 11:54 AM   #7
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,794
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
40mm DA f2.8 XS
This little wonder is always in my camera bag, everywhere I go. I takes up almost no space and weighs almost nothing. I use this lens far more than a 50mm, especially on the K-5
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
10-17mm DA f3.5-4.5 fish eye
great lens fisheye at one end, ultra wide at the other, great for landscapes, cities, and fun shots.
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
18-55mm F3.5 WR
MOstley for the WR capabilities, but it's actually a good quality lens for most situations.
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
18-250mm Sigma f3.5-6.3 macro hsm
The walk around all day, all situation lens. Plus it has macro.

The main question to ask yourself is " Do I want to be changing lenses throughout the day?" Look at you schedule, pick the lens that suits that activity, and make the most of it.

12-17-2016, 12:48 PM   #8
New Member




Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by MarkJerling Quote
Welcome to the forum. I think your selection would work well. Would it be necessary to take both 50mm's? Having said that, I probably would.
Kinda my thought was as a backup.
12-17-2016, 12:50 PM   #9
New Member




Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by xabolcs Quote
Greeting!
If I'm traveling, I take the following (and I no carried a long telephoto lens)
DA 10-17mm
50mm F 1.7
90mm F2.8
Thanks. It might be worth a trial at home but....that 150-500 for birds is going to come. Especially because there should be a number of species we have never seen before.
12-17-2016, 12:53 PM   #10
New Member




Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Kerrowdown Quote
Welcome to the forum.

To say I'm somewhat jealous would be a massive understatement.

My lens choice would be perhaps different to most folk, it is as follows... 50mm A f1.7, 50mm A f2.8 macro, 35-105 A f3.5, 150-500mm Sigma f5-6.3.

By way of an explanation for my choices, keeping overall kit as light as possible, then in order, something for low light, a great wee macro, a walk around "stack of primes" and something for your birds.

Also posting your query here, may get you more of a response. Pentax DSLR Discussion - PentaxForums.com
Well we typically try to do a big trip ever couple years. This will be the first with our little one who is 1 yr old. So very exciting.

Your lens selection is different if only because of only manual focus. Can you explain the stack of primes. To be honest in don't use the 35-105 much.

---------- Post added 12-17-16 at 12:54 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by pres589 Quote
Is this for your k5 or a future k1? Out of your current lens list, I might go with the 10-17, F 50 1.7, and I guess that 18-55 WR. Wide, walking zoom, and low light / portrait lens group. I could see selling a bunch of those lenses and getting the new 28-105 or a similar 3rd party full frame lens.
Good question. We are not sure we will be able to get the K1 before the trip. Though I'm trying....so let's say for this time. It's for the k5, and it there is some overlap to the K1 that's a bonus.
12-17-2016, 01:00 PM   #11
PEG Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland... "Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand" - William Blake
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 57,815
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
Can you explain the stack of primes. To be honest in don't use the 35-105 much
Many folk say... it's as good as carrying around all those focal lengths of primes.

Have a look at the comments here SMC Pentax-A 35-105mm F3.5 Reviews - A Zoom Lenses - Pentax Lens Reviews & Lens Database
12-17-2016, 01:01 PM   #12
New Member




Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by robgski Quote
This little wonder is always in my camera bag, everywhere I go. I takes up almost no space and weighs almost nothing. I use this lens far more than a 50mm, especially on the K-5

great lens fisheye at one end, ultra wide at the other, great for landscapes, cities, and fun shots.

MOstley for the WR capabilities, but it's actually a good quality lens for most situations.

The walk around all day, all situation lens. Plus it has macro.

The main question to ask yourself is " Do I want to be changing lenses throughout the day?" Look at you schedule, pick the lens that suits that activity, and make the most of it.

Well we are used to changing lenses. So that's not a problem. But we typically pick one or two for the day depending on the activity and leave the rest.

For example on a hike we might bring the 18-250, the macro and 80-320. But this totally depends on the season. Of there are now flowers the macro tends to stay at home.

Or if birding we might only bring the 150-500 and the 40mm macro.

Or in town maybe the fish eye, and the 18-250, and 50mm.

In Iceland. We have birding, hiking, landscapes, landscapes with people, and some city stuff.....

it covers the whole spectrum.
12-17-2016, 01:05 PM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2013
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,799
QuoteOriginally posted by armi101 Quote
Kinda my thought was as a backup.
Is there a reason you need the backup? Is it for the macro? Is it for the extra light? Is it because the 40mm XS wouldn't make a good back up for some reason?
12-17-2016, 01:53 PM   #14
Pentaxian
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,480
10-17
28-90 or 35-105
150-500

The 40 is small enough you might as well take it. If you can locate a 12-24 that is the lens I always recommend for the "what lens to take to..." question :-)
12-17-2016, 02:11 PM - 1 Like   #15
New Member




Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by lithedreamer Quote
Is there a reason you need the backup? Is it for the macro? Is it for the extra light? Is it because the 40mm XS wouldn't make a good back up for some reason?
The 40 actually would be a good backup. Ilk have to reconsider.

---------- Post added 12-17-16 at 02:14 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by Kerrowdown Quote
Many folk say... it's as good as carrying around all those focal lengths of primes.

Have a look at the comments here SMC Pentax-A 35-105mm F3.5 Reviews - A Zoom Lenses - Pentax Lens Reviews & Lens Database
So I've skimmed the threads for the 35-105. I should probably use it more, considering some of the reviews. I do find it heavy, and unless I'm shooting stationary objects I'm useless for manual focus. Unless shooting on an old ME.
Any tips for this.?
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
40mm, 50mm, backup, eye, f1.7, f2.8, fa, fish, k1, k5, lens, light, macro, reason, reviews, sigma, trip
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax 6x7 twin lens travel kit? johnha Pentax Medium Format 21 04-03-2018 04:23 PM
Compact vs 3-prime kit for travel? runswithsizzers Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 16 09-09-2016 03:03 PM
My (hypothetical) K-1 travel/hiking kit bpv_UW Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 17 05-10-2016 07:02 AM
Travel Photo Kit - Advice Welcomed! Blacknight659 General Photography 22 01-25-2016 04:24 PM
Pick my travel kit... caliscouser Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 32 09-01-2015 04:04 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:52 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top