Originally posted by mikesbike Welcome to the forum! I am also a looong-time film shooter, but have been mostly into digital for the past decade. Many others here also come from the film-only era. No need to be concerned about asking any "dumb" questions. Many who come to the forum have virtually no experience in photography, except for their cell phone. You are way ahead of their game-point. We have all been at point one at some time or other, and we are still learning, as learning is a lifelong proposition.
I've got some questions for you,. Since you are still using film, what kind of gear are you using (camera model and lenses)? How long have you been into this and do you have particular kinds of photographic interests? What is it about the "full-frame" K-1 that you find especially attractive? The K-1 is a great camera, but for certain particular uses there could be a better choice. Both FF and APS-C have certain advantages. As to a ML or MILC (Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera) there are pros and cons compared to a DSLR, the most major being having an optical viewfinder vs. electronic VF for mirrorless models. Pentax is the only brand of DSLR cameras offering a pro-grade glass pentaprism VF with 100% frame coverage over the entire current model lineup, including the K-70 entry-level model.
(This might wind up getting moved to the DSLR section! Or maybe you could respond there.)
I have two Minolta Maxxum 7000 bodies, lenses: 50mm/35-70/70-210, various filters, remote release, tripod (of course). Am looking to add a wide-angle. I do mostly landscape & a tiny bit street. I do all my shooting in Manual mode. Got my first SLR in 1973, a Minolta SRT101. Still have it. Got the Maxxum when it first came out, 1987 I think. Got a part-time job just to get it quicker. Shot a lot then stupidly took a long "break". And, NO, it's not like riding a bike! No video desire at this point. Am looking to get an FF digi.; just a personal preference notion. I like the K-1, by specs&reviews I've read. Plus, a 100% optical viewfinder! Just my preference over an EVF. Seems more than suitable for landscape. Plus, the title of one article I read basically said "be different ". It was about the K-1.The Mark II is refined a bit more but reviewers did not like the forced noise reduction in RAW. Would like to see some "real world" info on that aspect since that is the only thing holding me back on the II. Also, Ricoh has some really good glass.....be different!
As far as MILC, I'm drawn towards the Sony A7RII, a bit cheaper than S's newest. Still leaning toward DSLR over MILC. I have no real desire to become a C or N fanboy. But, I do have some time til my digi makeover comes to fruition. My wants may change by that time (4-6mos). Currently, most of my pics are on negs/slides. Need to get a scanner to digitize. Looking toward an Epson V600 but they're getting scarce-ish. Above that, more than I currently want to spend. See a lot of 550s though. So, in the meantime, I'll just shoot film to get my eye/skills back. A lot of great info on UHH. Still need to "wander around this site to see what's all available.