I'd agree with who said that a K10d might be a nice choice, ...only thing is, if you can get the kind of prices I can see on a new K20, here in the US this season, you probably really might as well go for that. I'm sure any K30 or other new model will be just nice, but, hey, I was expecting that I'd be trying to scrape up for anything with a moving mirror, till just recently, with a used K10 marginally preferred over the admittedly-quite nice K200, but a fortunate bunch of things just converged such that I could get right into the K20d... and in my honest assessment, this ought to be enough camera for me for quite a while.
So I'd look at that.
For entry-level, the K200 is just nice. I got to play with one a bit, and if you can live with the dubious matter of running on AA's, (this is what I'd call a drawback with some compensation to it) and it just felt right. I've never even handled a K20, though, and the chance to jump right into one wasn't something I had to be asked twice about.
Big caveats there being *if* you have the money and really want to spend twice as much for better AF speed, faster bursts, and better really-high-ISO performance, then maybe other systems have what you need right now. The way I shoot, I'm not expecting to notice the difference, (especially compared to things I can't have, anyway) though. I'm pretty old-school and mostly am pleased as punch to have a DSLR that isn't *lacking* anything I'd miss from old film cameras.
But then again, I'm just being all happy at Pentax right now for making something for the likes of me.
(Well, OK, maybe they should make a "Full Microprism Circle Screen For Fast Lenses, You Dinosaur," but still.
)
Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 11-28-2008 at 04:58 PM.
Reason: Additional wry comment.