Hello everybody,
Let me introduce myself: I've been what might perhaps be described as an "advanced amateur" photographer for many years now, and over this time I have gone through a fairly wide range of photographic equipment.
It all started for me over 30 years ago with my dad's ME and an M 50/1.7.
I then moved up to a Super-A with A 50/1.4, A 24/2.8, FA 100/2.8 Macro and AF280T flash, and stayed with those for several years, eventually swapping the body for a newer MZ-5n, mainly to have spot metering (which I found very useful with the slide film that I preferred using).
Then came the move to digital, with a Nikon D70s... and that's when I sold all my Pentax gear and moved to Nikon... and then Fuji, with an S5Pro (so I could continue using the Nikkor lenses).
Then, I liked the Fuji jpegs so much that I decided to switch to their mirrorless APS-C offerings, which again entailed a wholesale system switch. X-E1, X-E2s, X-Pro2, X-H1 and a few of their lenses.
Which eventually brings me full circle in a very round-about way: my current "main" camera system is still a Fuji body, but now the GFX50R, with a selection of wonderful SMC Pentax-A 645 lenses. I feel like I'm "home" again!
I admit that I initially decided to try these lenses as a sort of stop-gap, as more affordable alternatives to the native GF lenses.
But after using a few of them, and being very pleasantly impressed by the results I was obtaining, I decided to invest in some more, including the not-so-affordable 600mm super-telephoto.
Also, I knew from the start that the lack of autofocus would not bother me, as for the type of photography that I do, I generally prefer manual focus anyway.
Thus, I opted to only collect "A" series manual-focus lenses, instead of the later "FA" series lenses, since not only do the latter also become manual-focus-only when used as adapted lenses on non-Pentax bodies, but they have less smooth/precise manual focus helicoids.
Generally speaking, I found the P645 lenses to have a very endearing combination of technical qualities (i.e., sharpness, contrast, resistance to flare, minimal chromatic aberrations) and a slightly more "organic"/"vintage" character vs. most modern lenses. The latter is hard to define in quantitative terms, but I'll post a few images in the "Review" forum when I get the chance, and let those speak for themselves.
Marco.